White Civil Rights : The Website for Europeans and Americans Wherever They May Live

The pair fled a thought crime prosecution in Britain for offending non-Whites.

by Jeff Davis

The Yorkshire Post tells the story: “Two men convicted of publishing race-hate” [i.e. racially truthful] “articles on the internet have skipped bail and fled to the United States to claim political asylum…Simon Sheppard and Stephen Whittle were given bail by a judge at Leeds Crown Court on Friday, despite having been found guilty of a series of race-related offences. The pair were due to return to court on Monday while a jury continued deliberating over further charges, but they failed to show up… Last night Sheppard, 51, and Whittle, 41, were being held by immigration officials at Los Angeles Airport outside the jurisdiction of the British court system. It is believed that the pair travelled from the UK to Ireland by ferry before taking a direct flight to Los Angeles. They are likely to have their case considered at an immigration hearing in the US before UK authorities can secure their return.”

There’s just one little problem with White men trying to use political asylum laws: These laws are not meant to protect REAL victims of political persecution, especially pro-White activists, who speak the truth about racial differences or the Holocaust.

US political asylum laws are meant to allow in a flood of Chinese coolies, Haitian boat people and every imaginable Third World race, who are all making false political asylum claims. That’s how political asylum laws work in the US (and various nations of Europe). After making a false asylum claim, the illegal immigrant is released pending a hearing, usually with some kind of temporary visa that allows him every privilege native-born Americans have, including the right to work legally. Many of these invaders are coached by liberal activist groups in what stories to tell to the immigration authorities and the sympathetic media, and how to tell them.

The Yorkshire Post article notes “Sheppard, of Brook Street, Selby, was found guilty after a seven-week trial of 11 counts of publishing racially inflammatory written material. The jury gave unanimous verdicts on nine of the charges on Friday, and returned with two majority verdicts on Monday while Sheppard was absent. Whittle, of Avenham Lane, Preston, was convicted of five counts of publishing racially inflammatory written material. Four of the verdicts were reached unanimously on Friday, and the fifth was returned by a majority of 10 to one on Monday after Whittle had absconded.”

Of course it would make little difference if these men had appeared in court to defend themselves. They could have argued that every single thing they said was the truth, but the truth is irrelevant in the British legal system. If a brown-skinned foreigner takes offense at something that a White man says, the White man goes to jail in politically correct England.

None of the articles published by these men would be considered criminal in America, although the Anti-Defamation League of the B’nai Brith (ADL) and the Simon Wiesenthal Center are attempting to make them so. Both of these Englishmen should be entitled to asylum because they have a “well-founded fear of persecution” in their homelands. They are charged with no crime except writing and publishing dissident ideas, and their actions are not criminal in the United States.

I wish I could say the asylum law will actually help these White men, who truly need its protection, lest they go to jail for thought crimes, but our politicians and the Jewish-dominated “justice” department has no sympathy for White asylum seekers. It seems like it’s another case of “Only non-Whites need apply.”