Obama Can’t Be Trusted to End Iraq War
Barack Wasn’t in Senate for 2002 War Vote and Failed to Vote on Kyl-Lieberman Bill.
by James Buchanan
A recent news article reports that a former adviser of Barack Obama says that Obama may not be able to pull US troops out of Iraq within a year as promised. The American public could have supported a REAL anti-war candidate in the form of Ron Paul. Instead they behaved like nice, obedient sheep and they voted for system-approved candidates, who will continue to fight wars for Israel, run up the national debt, devalue our currency and flood America with illegal aliens.
During one national debate, Obama was asked if he would promise to bring US troops out of Iraq in four years and he said “NO.” It’s a little surprising to hear that Obama was promising crowds of Americans that he would pull troops out within in a year. Many politicians talk out of both sides of their mouth, but promising one thing to adoring crowds and the complete opposite during a debate is a bit much. If anyone has any illusions about Obama being trustworthy and honest, his two-faced approach to Iraq should be a huge red flag. Millions of Americans with relatives in the military will vote for Obama only to see their soldier-relatives stuck there for four more years –unless of course they’re horribly wounded or killed first.
Ron Paul should have told voters about Obama’s contradictory Iraq War positions. Unfortunately Paul was trying to be a nice guy, not criticizing other candidates. Unfortunately, nice guys finish last.
Obama is getting the anti-war vote, but does he really have any track record to support that? Millions of Americans are under the impression that Obama voted against the 2002 Bill to give Bush permission to go to war with Iraq. Most of us have heard news anchors or pundits make this claim. The truth is that Obama was NOT a Senator in 2002 when the Iraq War vote was taken. Obama has only been a Senator since January 2005.
Few Americans knew about the despicable Kyl-Lieberman Bill, which many patriots have criticized as a “stealth” declaration of war on Iran. A few courageous politicians insisted that some of the language be changed because the original form was a de facto invitation for war, and our lunatic president would surely have acted on it. Was Obama bravely fighting to change this bill? Did Obama vote against the bill because its final form might still lead to war? No. Obama failed to vote on the Kyl-Lieberman Bill. Apparently casting a vote for peace was not important enough to interrupt Obama’s presidential campaign. Either that or he’s yet another spineless politician who won’t risk offending the Israeli Lobby.
The truth is that Barack Obama is all hype and no substance. His voting record is painfully liberal. The National Debt will probably balloon to 15 trillion by the end of Obama’s first term. If he gives 20 million illegal aliens an Amnesty, that will create a tax burden greater than the one caused by World War Two. The one issue which people think he supports, ending the Iraq War, may not happen during his first term according to Barack himself.
Ron Paul would have pulled our troops out of Iraq as soon as possible. The blood of all the US soldiers who uselessly die in Iraq after Jan. 20th, 2009 is on the hands of the people who voted for McCain, Huckabee, Obama and all the other whores for Israel.