Duke Univ. Lacrosse Case: Black Stripper Lied
by Jeff Davis
The liberal media practically fell all over themselves in a rush to judgment against three Duke University lacrosse players who were accused of raping a stripper. The implication was that White college students were no better than the Black or Brown criminals, who are convicted of committing the vast majority of rapes in the US. The stripper accusing the students of rape was Black further enticing the liberal media to portray this as some sort of hate crime.
A liberal Democrat district attorney in Durham, North Carolina named Mike Nifong was facing a stiff re-election challenge in his primary in May. He decided that he needed to kiss some Black butt, and so he seems to have more or less fabricated this case out of thin air. Nifong won his primary, riding in on the coattails of a liberal media feeding frenzy about “privileged” White college boys allegedly raping a poor defenseless woman of color.
Apparently it never dawned on the liberal media that a stripper might lie. One news article reports “Jim Kouri of the Post Chronicle has an outstanding breakdown of the demise of the Duke rape case. Mr Kouri points out that in the early days of the Duke University rape case, District Attorney Mike Nifong practically called the case a ’slam dunk’. According to court papers filed yesterday, a second stripper told police early in their investigation that the accuser was out of her sight for only five minutes that night and that her allegations were a ‘crock’. The statement was made by Kim Roberts, who accompanied the alleged rape victim to the lacrosse team party last March, was cited in a filing by lawyers for Reade Seligmann, 20, one of three team members charged in the case. According to the Associated Press, a March 20 statement written by a Durham police investigator, Roberts ’stated that she heard that (the accuser) was sexually assaulted, which she stated is a ‘crock’ and she stated that she was with her the whole time until she left.’ “
Another news article reports “…with all of the recent revelations surrounding the very apparent non-rape by Duke Lacrosse team players, of an exotic dancer, it strongly (almost irrevocably at this juncture) appears that Durham District Attorney Michael Nifong was merely trying to get reelected. Recent revelations include statements given to police by the accuser’s dance partner that the accusation of rape was a ‘crock’ and that she was with the accuser during the entire time—including the time the alleged rape occurred. Also included are statements that the accuser had sexual relations with 3-4 other people (her ‘driver’ calls them ‘appointments’), including him, the same weekend as the Duke party. The Duke team players’ defense team advised the judge overseeing the case, that DA Nifong had left out essential exculpatory information, prior to presenting the case to the grand jury.
The actual case against the three Duke University lacrosse players, always wafer-thin under the best of circumstances since it was based on nothing other than the victim’s statement and forensic evidence which even the SBI crime lab called “inconclusive,” has now for all practical purposes collapsed. What appears to have happened is that several drunk frat boys used the “N-word” while the Black stripper was dancing. For this verbal offense, the stripper raced off to the police and initially claimed that 20 White boys had raped her. The stripper’s original story was pared down to a more believable “three” attackers and this whole circus was underway.
There are several lessons to be learned from this fiasco. Many college freshmen think they can have strippers at their events with no risk or repercussions. Well, the three individuals in the Duke lacrosse incident have just been dragged through hell, had their names published on national news shows as “rapists” and will -at best- be seen as sleazy individuals. Militant feminists will almost certainly continue to accuse these men of rape regardless of the evidence for decades into the future.
The Black stripper who accused the students of rape either hated White men and wanted to send a few to prison or she saw these students from wealthy families as nothing but bags of money to be exploited. If she succeeded in getting an all-Black jury to convict these boys of rape, a civil lawsuit would have followed -perhaps earning her enough money to retire from stripping. It’s not clear how complicit or how much encouragement she received from District Attorney Nifong to pursue this little scheme of hers if that was the case.
Another big lesson from all this is that young university students should make every effort to be good Christians and to not associate with Jews or Third World rabble. One of the three students in this scandal is Jewish. Jews typically have much lower ethical standards and often believe “It’s OK as long as you don’t get caught.” Christians should not be associating with Jews –especially in some degenerate party with strippers. The two “Christians”, who thought they’d watch a Black stripper with their Jewish “friend,” have just found out what sort of worst case scenario can happen from such behavior.