Ron Paul Needs to Respond to Vote Fraud
Ron Paul should hire people to do exit polls as a check on fraud.
by James Buchanan
First of all notice I didn’t say anything about vote fraud in Iowa. There weren’t any glaring signs of fraud there. The New Hampshire race however is screaming “vote fraud.” Hillary was trailing Obama by 13 percent according to a USA Today-Gallup poll, and we’re supposed to believe there was a 16 percent swing in favor of the Beast (Hillary) at the last minute. Why didn’t any of those people swing over to Edwards? Why would sane people want to vote for the least popular member of the Clinton crime family? Ron Paul was polling 15 percent in the polls before the election and after going through the Diebold voting machines this was whittled down to 8 percent.
It’s hard to get exact information because our masters don’t want us to know certain things. According to one Internet source 19 percent of the votes were counted by hand and 81 percent were counted by Diebold machines. One individual posted hand-count results, which gave Ron Paul 15 percent of the vote. That means that the Diebold machines were giving Ron Paul less than 8 percent to bring his average down to 8 percent.
An article on Prison Planet reports: “The head clerk of the New Hampshire town of Sutton has been forced to admit that Ron Paul received 31 votes yet when the final amount was transferred to a summary sheet and sent out to the media, the total was listed as zero. The fiasco throws the entire primary into doubt and could lead to a re-count. As we reported earlier today, an entire family voted for Ron Paul in Sutton, yet when the voting map on the Politico website was posted, the total votes for Ron Paul were zero. Vote fraud expert Bev Harris contacted the head clerk in Sutton, Jennifer Call, who was forced to admit that the 31 votes Ron Paul received were completely omitted from the final report sheet, claiming ‘human error’ was responsible for the mistake.” (more…)