White Civil Rights : The Website for Europeans and Americans Wherever They May Live

by Ian Mosley

No one ever believes me when I say we are going to lose the Internet. Everyone simply assumes that we’ll all be surfing the net forever. While we may not sink to the same level as Red China, which censors even Google search results, there are some alarming trends.

Our government has put up various trial balloons and stealth laws that government is using to deprive political and social critics of access to the Web. Now the lawyers are stepping in. Reuters reports that a web site which “…bills itself as the world’s most prestigious college discussion board” is now being subjected to a legal attack by two women who want to silence certain posters to the board. The article notes the “AudoAdmit site, widely used by law students for information on schools and firms, is also known as a venue for racist and sexist remarks and career-damaging rumors. Now it’s at the heart of a defamation lawsuit that legal experts say could test the anonymity of the Internet. After facing lewd comments and threats by posters, two women at Yale Law School filed a suit on June 8 in U.S. District Court in New Haven, Connecticut, that includes subpoenas for 28 anonymous users of the site, which has generated more than 7 million posts since 2004.”

Could the “racist and sexist remarks” possibly be accurate statements about how much racial and gender quotas may have helped certain people get into Harvard or Stanford while White males with higher GPAs find themselves going to their third choice of law school? (more…)

by Jeff Davis

More hideous news, out of Michigan this time. The Kalamazoo Gazette reports: “Police were searching this morning for a group of teenagers suspected of attacking a 46-year-old homeless man Thursday in downtown Kalamazoo. The man, a white male who resides at the Kalamazoo Gospel Mission, was walking in the 500 block of North Rose Street at about 6:30 p.m. when he was attacked, according to the Kalamazoo Department of Public Safety. Witnesses told police the man was attacked by a group of 15 black males who were all wearing white T-shirts. Police said the males repeatedly punched and kicked the victim, causing severe injuries to his face. He was taken to Bronson Methodist Hospital and admitted for treatment of nonlife-threatening injuries.” Well, at least they were “nonlife-threatening.”

The story goes on: “Investigators believe there were other people with the group who did not take part in the attack ‘but know exactly who the suspects are, and we’re asking for their assistance,’ Capt. Jim Mallery said.” (Lots of luck there, captain.). “The Public Safety Department increased patrols near the Gospel Mission and put plainclothes officers on the street last summer following reports that homeless people were being assaulted by teens on bikes and armed with bats, bricks and rocks. Also, from March 1 to May 22, police investigated 21 different assaults by teenagers and young adults, some of which police have said may have been perpetrated by rival groups affiliated with different sides of the city. In each case, a lone person was assaulted by groups of as few as two to as many as 11 people. In 15 of the incidents, police have said, a lone white male was attacked by a group of black males.”

No need to go on. We all get the picture. Multiply Kalamazoo by how many times for every city across the country where this is taking place? Hordes of black predators hunting down the weakest and most helpless white men they can find and tearing into them like beasts.

These homeless Whites just happen to be living in the worst parts of town where the Blacks have easy access to them. If you or I wandered into a Black neighborhood or if a group of Black teenagers invaded a White neighborhood, then they would be beating up ordinary White people, instead of homeless. We should take the attacks on White homeless as a clear warning sign that Blacks are a clear and present danger to all Whites. (more…)

by Ian Mosley

The United Kingdom continues to slide into exactly the kind of surveillance state that George Orwell predicted in his futuristic novel “1984.” Virtually every street corner and shopping mall in Great Britain today is monitored by closed circuit TV cameras. Now Britain has taken another step along the path to a total surveillance state. The London Daily Telegraph reports that “A council is to hide a camera in a bin (garbage) bag to catch residents who do not follow new rules about putting out the rubbish. A spy camera will be put in a rubbish bag left in an alleyway. Householders in a seaside town [Weymouth] have been told to put their bins out at the front of their homes and not in an alleyway to the rear. They must also leave their rubbish out between set times to ensure it does not attract pests or miss the dust cart. To enforce the new rules, a camera will be placed in a rubbish bag and left in an alleyway to blend in with the surroundings to catch offenders. Those filmed breaking the rules will be given a ticking off. Repeat offenders could be handed a fixed penalty notice or even be taken to court and fined up to 1,000 pounds.”

A thousand pound fine for not taking out the trash?

The Telegraph goes on: “The tiny covert camera, which has cost Weymouth and Portland Council, Dorset, up to 10,000 pounds, will also help catch householders who put their rubbish out too early or too late. The initiative has shocked local taxpayers. The spy camera is being introduced in the Park district in Weymouth… Residents in the area will have to follow strict rules which come into force on June 22. They will only be allowed to put out their rubbish between 8pm and 6am the night before collection and it will have to be at the front of their homes.” (more…)

Immigration-Amnesty Bill Still a Threat!!!

by James Buchanan

I seriously believe these traitors in the Senate are bringing up the immigration bill now, just as the weather is getting warm and people are starting to take vacations hoping that Joe Sixpack doesn’t pay attention. They tried to sneak the 400 page bill through right before Memorial Day and now they’re making a big push –while people are distracted again– at Father’s Day. I even wonder if the early pronouncement of the bill being “dead” wasn’t some additional trick to lull people into a false sense of security. Then they shove the bill through while 80 percent of the people think it’s been defeated.

The Amnesty Bill is alive and well and still a serious threat to the existence of America.

It’s difficult to organize people to protest against bills like this. The Immigration-Amnesty Bill literally arrived on the scene with no advance notice. I’m sure half of Americans can’t believe that such a piece of treason could be seriously considered by Congress. The other half of Americans are hoping that it won’t pass, but most are doing nothing to lobby their Senators and House Reps.

One news story tells of a hastily arranged anti-immigration rally.”More than 100 people gathered at the Washington Monument yesterday to protest immigration legislation that they reject as amnesty for the nation’s estimated 12 million illegal immigrants. Carrying signs with slogans such as “Reform Mexico Not the USA,” and T-shirts that read “Stop illegal immigration. Ask me how,” the demonstrators cheered, clapped and shouted as more than a dozen speakers from different organizations took the stage. March for America, a group that opposes President Bush’s immigration reforms, organized three days of marches and speakers across 14 states to urge tighter border protection and denounce opportunities to afford illegal immigrants a path to citizenship.” (more…)

by Jeff Davis

A day after the prosecutor in the Duke LaCrosse case resigned Michael Nifong has been disbarred for unethical conduct.

The Duke Lacrosse Rape Case has been likened to “the white version of the Scottsboro Boys”, an infamous case of the 1930s in which a gang of black rapists who violated a white woman were eventually freed from prison and escaped punishment due to the organized liberal sob sisters of the time, as well as the efforts of the American Communist Party. There is a crucial difference, though: the Scottsboro rapists were guilty, and the three “whites” accused (one is a Jew) in Durham were innocent.

The politically ambitious and completely unscrupulous Durham County, N.C. District Attorney, Michael Nifong, pushed the case against the LaCrosse players even though it was obvious from the start that there was no basis for a case. WRAL-TV in Raleigh reports that “Mike Nifong acknowledged inconsistencies in an exotic dancer’s story that she was raped, beaten and sexually assaulted at a Duke lacrosse team party but decided to move forward with the case anyway, the lead investigator on the case testified Tuesday. During an initial meeting at Nifong’s office, (black) Investigator Benjamin Himan said, he and his supervisor met with the district attorney to review the evidence and status of the case and that Nifong made a comment to the effect, ‘You know we’re f****d.’” (Meaning the highly-publicized case had no merit.) This was in the very early stages of the “case,” which Nifong then dragged out for over a year after tossing off this casual comment to the lead detective. (more…)

by Jeff Davis

Believe it or not George W. Bush like a demented Doctor Frankenstein is trying to bring back to life something that is better off dead. The Senate was taken by surprise by the public’s vehemently negative reaction to the recent Amnesty Bill for illegal aliens. Senate majority leader Harry Reid pronounced the bill dead after 49 Senators voted to filibuster. The damned thing isn’t even cold in its grave before these morally denatured reptiles in business suits are trying to sneak it back to life.

The Amnesty Bill was drawn up in secret by Teddy Kennedy and George Bush (two of the most hated and corrupt politicians in American politics today). A recent news article reports that various traitors in the Senate and Bush are working hard to bring back the much hated Amnesty Bill. No doubt they will use every trick in the book to disguise the fact that the bill is an amnesty for the Third World hordes who have overrun America. The article notes that a bipartisan group is trying to convince skeptical Republicans to revive the measure. (more…)

by James Buchanan

George Bush is truly a piece of work. He tried to ram the Harriet Miers Supreme Court nomination down our throats despite massive public opposition. He approved of the sale of five major ports to the Arab nation of Dubai also against major public opposition. He keeps our troops stuck in Iraq despite massive public opposition, and he put through a “surge” or escalation to send even more US troops into Iraq also against massive public opposition. Bush has damaged our relations with many traditional allies in Europe and he is doing everything he can to alienate and make an enemy out of the new Russian republic.

We were warned that if Bush and Cheney were not impeached, then Bush would use his last two years in office to pass more treason, take away more rights and do more damage. Sure enough, Bush played a key role in trying to pass the illegal alien Amnesty Bill. Even though the Senate majority leader Harry Reid pronounced the bill “Dead,” the criminal lunatic George Bush is trying to resurrect the bill by pressuring 15 Senators to vote in support of the bill.

Once again we need to fight this bill and to put a few extra nails in the coffin to make sure the Amnesty vampire does not get out. Call the Senators in the list below to fight this evil bill:

Bush thinks he can strong-arm 15 of these 19 Republicans into changing their mind on the amnesty bill. He wants to “see you at the bill signing.” Target these 19, and tell them not to give into Bush’s plan to ruin our country!

Alexander, Lamar- (R – TN) (202) 224-4944

Bennett, Robert F.- (R – UT) (202) 224-5444

Cochran, Thad- (R – MS) (202) 224-5054

Coleman, Norm- (R – MN) (202) 224-5641

Collins, Susan M.- (R – ME) (202) 224-2523

Cornyn, John- (R – TX) (202) 224-2934

Craig, Larry E.- (R – ID) (202) 224-2752

Domenici, Pete V.- (R – NM) (202) 224-6621

Gregg, Judd- (R – NH) (202) 224-3324

Hatch, Orrin G.- (R – UT) (202) 224-5251

Hutchison, Kay Bailey- (R – TX) (202) 224-5922

Kyl, Jon- (R – AZ) (202) 224-4521

Lott, Trent- (R – MS) (202) 224-6253

McConnell, Mitch- (R – KY) (202) 224-2541

Murkowski, Lisa- (R – AK) (202) 224-6665

Smith, Gordon H.- (R – OR) (202) 224-3753

Snowe, Olympia J.- (R – ME) (202) 224-5344

Stevens, Ted- (R – AK) (202) 224-3004

Warner, John- (R – VA) (202) 224-2023

from http://michellemalkin.com/

by Philip Giraldi

Sometimes it really is déjà vu all over again. Those who have hoped for a peaceful resolution of the outstanding issues between the United States and Iran must have been discouraged to watch the June 5 Republican presidential candidates’ debate. With the honorable exception of Ron Paul, the Republicans lined up firmly in support of a policy to stop Iran’s acquisition of a nuclear weapon using whatever means are necessary to do so, including the American nuclear arsenal. All except Paul derided Iran as the main source of terrorism in the world. Rudy Giuliani repeated the now familiar “you shouldn’t take any options off the table” when asked about the possible use of nuclear weapons against Iran and stated that he even opposes Iran’s acquisition of “nuclear power.” Duncan Hunter said flatly that he “would authorize the use of tactical nuclear weapons” against Iran. The top Republican candidates united in their view that the Democrats would be soft on the issue of Iran, a charge that lacks validity as the leading Democratic candidates for president are as bellicose as the Republicans when it comes to Tehran’s ambitions.

And the media is doing its bit to help the cause, just like in the lead-up to Iraq, this time by completely ignoring the issue. The New York Times’ coverage of the debate did not even mention Iran, stressing instead disagreements on immigration policy. The Washington Post also was silent, as if the general agreement by presidential candidates to use nuclear weapons to bomb a sovereign nation that has not attacked the United States is not newsworthy.

It is arguable that the candidates are just polishing up their pro-Israel credentials and are not to be taken seriously when they speak about Iran, a subject on which they appear to know little or nothing. But is also possible that momentum is building that will lead to a war willy-nilly, whether or not it is in the national interest and whether or not anyone genuinely wants it. Iran’s alleged support of terrorism refers to its links to Hamas and Hezbollah, groups operating against the Israeli occupation of Palestine and parts of Lebanon and not against the United States, a refinement that appears to exceed the grasp of America’s political elite. Sam Brownback specifically insisted that “we have to stand with our allies like Israel,” revealing that he considers Israel’s security paramount. (more…)

by Ian Mosley

Why is it that only foreign newspapers and web sites these days seem to be reporting anything interesting? The UK news site First Post reports that “Iraq is so far from a conclusion that the US may have to bring in a draft. The US is considering introducing a limited military draft if it is to keep its present force levels in Iraq and Afghanistan, Pentagon advisers have warned British colleagues.” Now, this isn’t unexpected. It’s been clear for years that America simply DOESN’T HAVE THE TROOPS to maintain this far-flung petroleum empire Bush and the neocons have embarked upon. But why do we have to rely on a British news source for us to hear this? This ought to be front page in every American newspaper and the topic of discussion of every talking head show on cable. Instead all we’re seeing is Paris Hilton crying her eyes out as she goes to jail.

First Post goes on: “Next month, US forces in Iraq will peak at around 170,000, and GIs in the new units are being told they could be on operations for at least 15 months.” So much for the “temporary surge.” I think we all knew Bush was lying when he said those extra troops would be over there for only a few months, but still, it’s enraging to have it confirmed and for no one to even so much as notice it, they’re all so glued to American Idol and the NBA playoffs.

The article goes on: “Over Memorial Day weekend, Americans have been faced by the grim statistic that in the year since the last Memorial Day, very nearly 1,000 US military have been killed in Iraq, and many more wounded. These are the worst casualty rates since the coalition invaded Iraq in March 2003… British Army chiefs are mulling over a new report that reservists, mainly from the Territorial Army, are suffering combat stress worse than regulars because of lack of attention when they return home. Commanders are concerned by the high rate of young officers applying for voluntary redundancy when they return from Iraq and Afghanistan; in some frontline infantry battalions the rate of officers applying for early retirement is as high as 17 per cent.” (more…)

Paul finally begins to translate online popularity to mainstream America

by Charles Coughlin

For the past month, there has been a gigantic difference between how Ron Paul did on online polls and how he has done on “official” polls by the likes of Zogby and Rasmussen. A few people charged that Ron Paul followers were somehow hacking online polls, but these charges have been dismissed by computer experts. A more likely explanation was that patriots, libertarians and true Conservatives spend a lot more time on the Internet (since their views are seldom presented and often ridiculed in the mainstream media). These folks are more likely to vote in Internet polls and they found Ron Paul to be the best candidate by far in the Republican Primary.

Ron Paul has been consistently placing first in online polls ever since the first debate, often far ahead of his nearest competitor. An MSNBC poll after the first debate had over 91,000 votes and Ron Paul won that poll by a double digit lead over Mitt Romney. An MSNBC poll after the third debate had Ron Paul getting 63 percent with over 17,000 votes. Paul ran away with the ABC online poll (which didn’t even include him at first since he was seen -by them- as a long shot). Several independent online polls have also seen Paul winning against his Republican opponents, and even against Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama. (more…)