White Civil Rights : The Website for Europeans and Americans Wherever They May Live

Time’s Running Out; We only have until Monday afternoon.

by James Buchanan

The first vote on the Immigration Bill will take place Monday evening, May 31st. The first vote may be the only opportunity to stop this bill because this vote will decide whether or not a filibuster will be allowed. This is an extreme threat to America’s future. Fortunately, we have the Internet so hopefully we can derail this express train of treason. Every Patriotic American needs to tell his Senators to vote against the Immigration Bill (to vote “no on cloture” on May 21st).

One source reports “No committee hearings are to be held on what may well be the most important legislation of the decade. As Senator Chuck Grassley [R-IA] correctly pointed out: ‘It’s disappointing and even ironic how the deal announced today skirts the democratic processes of Congress. It was cut by a group of senators operating outside the committees of jurisdiction and without public hearings on key components.’ [A ‘Troubled’ Immigration Reform Proposal | President Bush and the Democrats reach a compromise on immigration reform, by Lorraine Woellert and Eamon Javers, BusinessWeek, May 18, 2007] As of early Saturday morning, May 19, the public has not even been shown the text of the bill. The ultimately failed amnesty legislation the Senate passed last year was 118,277 words long. This may well be more complicated. A photo of the first draft shows it to be almost twice as thick as a Bible. So reading the new bill carefully will likely take at least 10 uninterrupted hours, and quite possibly twice that, a span of time that few Senators have readily available. To truly understand how the legislation would work and what its long term implications are would take weeks of questioning and debate. Nonetheless, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV) wants to have the entire bill passed by Memorial Day, a week from now. Even more appallingly, Reid wants to hold the crucial ‘cloture’ vote to shut off the possibility of a filibuster, the best chance to derail it, on Monday, May 21!”

You can contact your Senators as follows:

Contact info for Senators can be found here:

http://www.johnandkenshow.com/senators/

This links to an online form to contact Senators:

http://www.senate.gov/general/contact_information/senators_cfm.cfm

You can go to this web site:

http://www.numbersusa.com/faxcenter?action=preview&ID=7873

Click on “fax Congress free.”

Fill in some info and they’ll send an anti-immigration fax to your House Rep. and Senators.

And here’s some public info on Senators’ phone numbers: (more…)

by James Buchanan

This is possibly the most important political crisis of the last ten years and the biggest betrayal of the American public since NAFTA.

The Immigration Bill is being rushed through Congress at warp speed. The vote on Monday, May 21st, will be to prevent additional debates or filibusters on this bill. We NEED Senators to filibuster this bill since we don’t know how many politicians in Congress will sell us out this time.

Bush and Congress are trying to rush this bill through before public opposition can build.

People need to take the info in this article and e-mail it to everyone in their address books to help stop this bill.

******************************************

Tell your Senators to vote against the Immigration Bill (or “vote no on cloture”) on Monday, May 21st. (This will kill the Immigration Bill by allowing Senators to filibuster it.)

Time’s running out. Do it now!!

Contact info for Senators can be found here:

http://www.johnandkenshow.com/senators/ (more…)

by Jeff Davis

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. Beware, beware, beware any time you hear the words “immigration reform” coming out of the mouths of anyone in politics or anywhere in the vicinity of Washington D.C. or New York City. They are not talking about “reforming” anything. In their case, it is a code word for amnesty–in other words, opening the floodgates and transforming the United States of America into a Third World nation.

The Drudge Report carried a recent story on this. It began on a hopeful note: “Six conservative senators are demanding that Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R.-Ky.) negotiate a full and open debate on immigration legislation.”

Of course, we also need to beware of the designation “conservative”. In American politics, that often means a traitor with a nicer haircut and a more expensive suit. Anyway, back to Drudge: “Senate Democrats and Republicans are working feverishly with the White House to put the finishing touches on an immigration proposal that could be announced later today or tomorrow. The deal would give illegal aliens living in the United States amnesty, according to confidential sources. It would also allow illegal aliens to bring their parents, spouses and children into the United States.” (more…)

by James Buchanan

After decades of failure by the federal government to deport any large number of illegal aliens, a man in southern California has taken the law into his own hands, rounded up six illegal alien day laborers and dumped them over the border in Tijuana. Most ordinary Americans would like to give this man a medal. But the George Bush regime would rather hunt this man down like a dog rather than deport the twenty million illegals they’ve deliberately let into this country.

A recent news article reports “Day laborer activists on Wednesday called for a full investigation into the alleged kidnapping of six workers driven from the Inland Valley to Tijuana last week and abandoned. Advocates for the day laborers said three people were approached in Rancho Cucamonga and offered employment on May 9, before they were taken to the Ontario Convention Center where they were joined by three other day laborers. According to day-laborer organizers, the six workers were tied up and driven to Tijuana where they were abandoned. News of the alleged kidnapping had been circulating via e-mail in the past week by immigrant-rights groups that initially blamed members of the Minuteman Project.”

Can anyone blame an ordinary American if he did a vigilante deportation? Can anyone blame some ordinary White guy who grew up in San Diego and saw his neighborhood and public schools turn from White to Brown? While the Feds will go out of their way to catch this guy, ordinary Americans could not have more sympathy for what this man has done. If the Feds do arrest this man and try to crush him with the iron fist of the judicial system, all the vigilante has to do is ask for a jury trial. (more…)

by Rep. Ron Paul

Congress voted this past week to authorize nearly $40 billion for the Department of Homeland Security, but the result will likely continue to be more bureaucracy and less security for Americans.

Five years into this new department, Congress still cannot agree on how to handle the mega-bureaucracy it created, which means there has been no effective oversight of the department. While Congress remains in disarray over how to fund and oversee the department, we can only wonder whether we are more vulnerable than we were before Homeland Security was created.

I was opposed to the creation of a new Homeland Security department from the beginning. Only in Washington would anyone call the creation of an additional layer of bureaucracy on top of already bloated bureaucracies “streamlining.” Only in Washington would anyone believe that a bigger, more centralized federal government means more efficiency.

When Congress voted to create the Homeland Security department, I strongly urged that – at the least – FEMA and the Coast Guard should remain independent entities outside the department. Our Coast Guard has an important mission – to protect us from external threats – and in my view it is dangerous to experiment with rearranging the deck chairs when the United States is vulnerable to attack. As I said at the time, “the Coast Guard and its mission are very important to the Texas Gulf coast, and I don’t want that mission relegated to the back burner in a huge bureaucracy.” (more…)

by Charles Coughlin

Do patriotic White Americans finally have a candidate they can vote for without fear of being sold out again? The Bush family has proven itself the equivalent of political toxic waste. The Bush family supports Open Borders and sees nothing wrong with filling America up with Mexicans. Bush Junior’s occupation of Iraq has cost the Republicans control of Congress. Many Republicans would like to see a complete change of direction. Ron Paul has been consistently against the Iraq War and he also supports securing the Mexican border.

One right wing web site reports that Ron Paul went from relative obscurity to a double digit lead after the first Republican debate in an MSNBC online poll. Jim Capo reports “Now in 2007, Ron Paul comes along last week and gives by most accounts of honest grassroots Americans the best performance in the first televised debate between GOP presidential contenders. Exclusively broadcast by MSNBC, Ron Paul led MSNBC’s post election poll from start to finish with nearly a double digit margin over his nearest challenger Mitt Romney. An even more crushing defeat of the rest of the pack occurred in an ABC News poll which at first had been posted on-line with only nine names on it — Ron Paul’s being the one missing. Irate Paul supporters who complained in the poll’s comment section at first saw many of their posts ominously deleted — some no doubt for language, others for editorial discretion bordering on the c word (censorship). After someone posted in the comment’ thread the cell phone number of a Senior VP at ABC News, the Paul name was added to the poll.”

Admittedly the first Republican debate had a small audience. Most people have gotten sick of the “lock step” Republican support for the Iraq War and didn’t watch the debate assuming the candidates would be all the same. Most Americans didn’t know Ron Paul wants us out of Iraq. Still, it’s extremely significant that Ron Paul could jump ahead of the entire field based on a single performance. It also proves that the two biggest issues in 2007 are immigration and getting out of Iraq. Ron Paul is on the right side of both of these issues while the other Republicans (except for Tancredo on immigration) are falling short. If anyone can gain a great deal of momentum through the debate process, it’s Ron Paul. (more…)

by James Buchanan

Bush continues to insist that we can “win” the Iraq war. The definition of winning the war is extremely vague. Bush has repeatedly said that our forces will stand down when the new Iraqi army stands up. There’s just one little problem. There’s not a chance in hell the Iraqi Army will be able to beat the rebels. A recent news article reports that the US recently lost five Stryker armored vehicles in just one week. If the US Army is losing equipment at this rate, what will become of the Iraqi Army which will have only a fraction of our resources?

The most sane course of action for George W. Bush would be to bail out of Iraq. Bush has painted himself into a corner by repeatedly dismissing this as a “cut and run” policy. If Bush had been more open-minded and much less stubborn, he could have dropped the Iraqi mess, the minute it began to fester and smell. Recent history has favored American presidents, who pulled out of Third World disasters after getting their fingers burned. Ronald Reagan had enough sense to cut his losses and get out of Lebanon after 241 Marines were killed in a massive truck bombing. Bill Clinton had enough sense to cut his losses and get out of Somalia after the “Blackhawk Down” disaster. Americans don’t care about these Third World nations. By “staying the course” Bush is guaranteeing that he will have a negative political legacy. Even if through some miracle, we built a stable democracy in Iraq, it would still be seen as a failure because of the half-trillion dollar price tag and because of the fanatic religious mullahs, who would be elected by the Iraqi people. Staying in Iraq is a “lose-lose” proposition. (more…)

by Jeff Davis

Once more a famous celebrity has let slip some unguarded and uncensored comments about Jews and poofters. This time it’s a stage magician who is virtually unknown in this country, but who is quite famous in Europe, and whose remarks will carry a fair amount of weight there.

The Drudge Report tells us that “Swedish magician Joe Labero (the stage name of Lars Bengt Roland Johansson) has provoked a strong reaction with suggestions that Las Vegas is controlled by “Jewish business syndicates, American dollar millionaires and homosexual booking agents”. The magic master’s comments were made in an interview with rail company SJ’s on-board magazine Kupé. As a prelude to his controversial thesis, Labero explained that he has long been close to getting his own show in Las Vegas. ‘But at the end of the day it seems to be impossible - unless you are a homosexual, a Jew or an American. I don’t mean to sound prejudiced of course, I’m just cynical. A blond Swedish Viking will have a hard time breaking through the hierarchies that control Vegas, where power rests in the hands of Jewish business syndicates, American dollar millionaires and homosexual booking agents.’”

And why shouldn’t he complain? His career has hit a kosher ceiling artificially imposed by Gays and Jews in the entertainment industry, who refuse to give equal opportunity to straight White males.

If Joe had a flamboyant partner and a tiger act with sequined outfits, he no doubt could have swished his way through a lengthy career in Las Vegas. (more…)

by Paul Craig Roberts

British Prime Minister Tony Blair, or more accurately, George W. Bush’s lap dog, has resigned to England’s relief.

Boris Johnson at the Daily Telegraph wrote that “Blair cannot escape the blame for a disaster in which at least 60,000 (and possibly 10 times as many) Iraqis have died, and which is causing 40,000 Iraqis to flee the country every month.”

The Daily Mail’s Piers Morgan wrote that Blair’s complicity in the invasion of Iraq transformed England “into a more dangerous, paranoid, despised and ridiculed country. Blair’s reign will be remembered for one disaster of epic proportions, one appalling legacy.”

Claire Short, a former Blair minister, said, “I think Tony’s place in history is Iraq and the deceit and the desperate mess and it’s sad. It’s going to be a very bad place in history.”

Many wonder why Blair destroyed his reputation and that of his country, put himself at risk of being hauled before the International Criminal Court, and squandered his time as prime minister providing cover for George Bush’s war of aggression. The answer must be money. We will see which US corporate boards take Blair as a director and which groups pay him six-figure honorariums for speeches.

Bush will have an even worse place in history. There is no longer any doubt that Bush deceived Congress and the American people. At great financial and human cost, Bush took America to war and destroyed Iraq for a hidden agenda. After years of swallowing Bush’s lies, the American people finally caught on. Bush’s approval rating is at 28 percent, but the TV and print media are still sycophantic. (more…)

by Ian Mosley

Well, folks, it’s time we took another look at that paradise of black rule, Zimbabwe. You know, the southern African nation that used to be called Rhodesia, and which under white rule was an advanced and economically vibrant society that actually exported food to the rest of Africa. Under international pressure the last white prime minister Ian Smith surrendered the White-run nation to black communists. They “liberated” the country from “evil white racism” and established a Marxist black dictatorship, where millions of black people are now starving or have fled. That Zimbabwe.

The Zimbabwean.com web site reports “Tazivei, a tough-looking 30 year-old, works at the S&M brickworks outside Harare, and he’s just been paid. He should be a happy man, but he’s not. He’s covered in bites from lice, his hands and feet are corrugated with painful cracks, he works in filthy conditions and his pay is miserably low. Tazivei works for the Chinese. The Chinese are Mugabe’s new friends. China is currently the world’s biggest investor in Zimbabwe, and Chinese-owned businessmen flourish here (the southern part of Harare has become known as China City).” (As a historical aside, the first Asians that Mugabe brought in were the North Koreans, who provided troops in the mid-1980s to maintain Mugabe’s Marxist one-party state in power and slaughter his tribal and political enemies.) (more…)