White Civil Rights : The Website for Europeans and Americans Wherever They May Live

by Jeff Davis

Yahoo News reports that “Hillary Rodham Clinton entered the 2008 U.S. presidential race on Saturday with a swipe at President George W. Bush as she capped years of speculation about her White House ambitions.” Well, you could have just knocked me down with a feather, I was so surprised!

Like hell. The bleached-blonde poster girl for Political Correctness has been running for president ever since she had to be dragged kicking and screaming out of the White House in 2001. Some members of the Clinton regime literally trashed their offices when Al Gore lost his election. All sorts of White House valuables disappeared as the Clintons left the White House. A few items were grudgingly returned. (more…)

by Ian Mosley

Senile Marxist African dictator Robert Mugabe finally seems to have realized that he killed the goose that lays the golden eggs. Mugabe drove virtually all of Zimbabwe’s white farmers off their land years ago. Now the old tyrant is begging them to come back and save him and Zimbabwe (formerly Rhodesia).

It should be noted that the white pioneers and farmers of Rhodesia cleared jungle, irrigated land and built their farms where the Africans previously had no presence. Just a few hundred thousand whites were able to feed themselves and a black population that swelled to over five million. A Communist insurgency supported by the Soviet Union, Cuba and a number of Hollywood celebrities fought an insurgency to take Rhodesia away from white rule. After resisting the foreign pressure for years, supported by white soldiers of fortune from all over the world, including quite a few Vietnam vets, the President of Rhodesia Ian Smith surrendered his nation to Mugabe, and the result has been a disaster for both the whites and blacks. (more…)

by Jeff Davis

Another interesting celebrity teapot tempest is brewing on the concept of forbidden words proving blacks have limited immunity to Political Correctness. According to the New York Post, “The drama backstage at Grey’s Anatomy is threatening to dwarf the one on-screen. The show’s stars this week are openly fighting over whether Grey’s star (black) Isaiah Washington used a gay slur (faggot) to refer to co-star T.R. Knight earlier this season - and forced him to ‘come out’ in People magazine. The incident was thought to be dead and buried until last Monday night at the Golden Globes when Washington vehemently denied (that he) called Knight a faggot during an on-set argument with another actor, co-star Patrick Dempsey.”

The black actor denies saying it, according to the Post. “‘No, I did not call T.R. a faggot,’ Washington told reporters at a press conference right after the awards show. ‘Never happened, never happened.’…On the show, Washington plays the steely Dr. Preston Burke and Knight plays the bumbling Dr. George O’Malley.” (But of course… We can’t have a strong white male character contrasting with a bumbling, incompetent, Affirmative Action black, now, can we? Where do we think this is, real life?) (more…)

by Jeff Davis

The dumbing-down of America continues apace. Not enough black and Mexican kids have been able to get into “advanced” classes reserved for children who demonstrate higher IQs. These classes invariably fill up with mostly white children so the NEA-dominated public school system is responding by lowering the admission standards. (Who do they think they are? The United States military?)

The International Herald Tribune reports that “Florida policymakers are considering changes to the state’s gifted education program that could redefine the smart kid and let more join the club next school year. The proposal, which effectively lowers IQ standards, has the potential to reshape one of public education’s most loved and loathed programs.” It takes no special gift to read between the lines here: “redefining the smart kid” means redefining the white kid out of the picture. (more…)

by Ian Mosley

James Earl Carter was one of the worst presidents of the United States surpassed only by the evil treasonous presidents such as Woodrow Wilson and Franklin Delano Roosevelt. He presided over the terminal moral decay of America in the late 1970s, and he has since then spent his time building houses for “low income” people, which invariably means Blacks and Latinos since poor Whites rarely get any charity. But now Carter has done something which might actually somewhat redeem him in the eyes of history. In his old age, he finally decided to take on the Jews, in public. No other American president has yet displayed this kind of moral courage–Richard Nixon kept his critical comments on Jewish media control strictly private, as revealed in his self-recorded tapes.

What Carter did was write a book in which he described his own attempts to get Israel to make peace at Camp David, and clearly assessed the present Middle Eastern situation, placing the blame for the current bloodbath, where it belongs: squarely on the Jews who stole the Palestinians’ land and who have created the world’s largest open air prison in Gaza, the only known attempt in history so far to lock up and imprison an entire nation of people. (more…)

by James Buchanan

Bush hit a new low of 29 percent for job approval in a recent poll. Given the fiasco in Iraq, the nearly nine trillion dollar national debt and the twenty million illegal aliens in the US, whom Dubya wants to give a guest worker amnesty, why does anyone still support George Bush? Who are these people in that 29 percent of Americans, who keep drinking the neocon Kool Aide no matter what happens?

While the image of Bush as a folksy pro-gun decent guy, who’ll stand against insanity like Gay marriage, helped get him elected in 2000, Bush’s commitment to conservative ideals or even the Bill of Rights has been dreadful. Not even the most fervent opponent of George W. Bush in the year 2000 would have predicted that he would be rationalizing torture, spying on Americans without warrants and sacrificing the lives of our soldiers for his legacy. (more…)

by Charles Coughlin

Anyone familiar with the real Martin Luther King Jr. knows a man far removed from the patron “saint” of liberalism that he has become today. Every January 15th, we hear excerpts from his speeches and we are told how “great” he was. Invariably quotes from King’s “I have a dream speech” are played. In the most important line in that speech, King proclaimed that people should be judged by the content of their character and not the “color of their skin.” Let’s dissect that speech and determine if King really was a “great man” or if his very words make him a hypocrite and a phony.

If King truly wanted people judged by the content of their character, then why didn’t he urge the government and universities to create completely color-blind tests for jobs and admission policies for higher education?? This is exactly the sort of policy that would result from King’s most famous speech if taken literally —and if King were telling the truth. If King, the liberals and the liberal media truly wanted equality of opportunity, this could have been achieved almost overnight by requiring a written exam for each job and giving the job to the person with the highest score. (more…)

by Jeff Davis

One of the main objectives of organized liberalism these days is to prevent local police and local authorities from any attempt to enforce immigration laws or prevent the influx of illegal aliens into their areas. An article in the Providence Journal reports that “The Rhode Island Affiliate of the American Civil Liberties Union yesterday filed a federal lawsuit against the state police, alleging racial profiling and violation of the constitutional rights of 14 Guatemalan nationals during a July traffic stop that led to their detention by immigration officials….The lawsuit names the State of Rhode Island, the state police, state police Supt. Steven M. Pare and Trooper Thomas Chabot individually; and a Jane Doe state trooper whose identity the ACLU was unable to establish.”

The Journal states that “The allegations stem from a traffic stop by Chabot early on July 11 on Route 95 in Richmond. According to the lawsuit, Chabot pulled over a van operated by Carlos A. Tamup because Tamup had failed to use his turn signal when changing lanes.The lawsuit alleges that Chabot first confirmed that Tamup’s license and registration were valid and that he had no criminal record. ‘Chabot nonetheless proceeded to open the doors of the vehicle, and by utilizing Tamup as a translator, requested all the passengers to also provide identification,’ according to an ACLU synopsis of the case. When some failed to do so, Chabot then asked them to produce documents demonstrating their U.S. citizenship. When none of the 14 were able to do so, Chabot advised them that they would all be escorted to the federal Office of Immigration and Customs Enforcement in Providence.” (more…)

by James Buchanan

If the US government actually cared about its own citizens, it would maintain a policy of neutrality in the Third World. It would buy oil and other natural resources at market values and encourage Third World nations to live at peace with each other. Through this sort of policy, the price of natural resources could be kept at a minimum. Americans would only be paying one dollar per gallon for gas. Sadly “our” government doesn’t care about US citizens. “Our” government will gladly sacrifice the lives of US soldiers in one war after another, benefiting only the major oil companies and certain Zionist interests.

Shortly after the first Gulf War, a news story leaked out that US soldiers acting under secret orders torched the Kuwait oil wells. One article reported “During the past six years, the American Gulf War Veterans Association has received numerous reports from veterans stating that US forces–including Navy Seals, Marine Force Recon, and Delta Force–were responsible for the setting of the oil well fires at the end of the Gulf War. One veteran has now stepped forward and given a detailed account of how he and others in special teams, moved forward of the front, behind enemy lines ahead of US forces, set explosive and incendiary charges on the well heads, and remained hidden until after the charges were remotely detonated and US forces advanced beyond their position.” (more…)

Dear Mr. President,

Thanks for your address to the nation. It’s good to know you still want to talk to us after how we behaved in November.

Listen, can I be frank? Sending in 20,000 more troops just ain’t gonna do the job. That will only bring the troop level back up to what it was last year. And we were losing the war last year! We’ve already had over a million troops serve some time in Iraq since 2003. Another few thousand is simply not enough to find those weapons of mass destruction! Er, I mean… bringing those responsible for 9/11 to justice! Um, scratch that. Try this — BRING DEMOCRACY TO THE MIDDLE EAST! YES!!! (more…)