White Civil Rights : The Website for Europeans and Americans Wherever They May Live

by Paul Craig Roberts

Faced with mounting civilian carnage, both from war crimes committed by demoralized and broken U.S. troops and from the raging civil war unleashed by Bush’s ill-fated, illegal invasion of Iraq, the House Defense Appropriations Subcommittee has decided to waste another $50 billion to continue the lost war for five more months. Our elected “representatives” are so in thrall to the powerful military-industrial complex that no amount of American shame, pariah status, and military defeat can shut off the flow of taxpayers’ funds to the merchants of death.

Bush’s wars in Iraq and Afghanistan are costing hard-pressed U.S. taxpayers $300,000,000 per day! These wars are lost. Yet, imbecilic members of Congress are in the process of funding the war for another year. Multiply $300 million by 365 days and you get $109,500,000,000. These are not the full costs. The huge figure does not include the destroyed equipment, destroyed lives, and long-term care of the maimed and disabled. (more…)

by James Buchanan

If you have a tendency to watch the news unquestioningly, you probably think that al Zarqawi was a real person and that he was killed in a recent air attack. He was mentioned dozens if not hundreds of times in the last three years and somehow our military could not find this man even though we occupied all of Iraq and found a deck of Iraqi bigshots including Saddam himself. How much proof of his existence do we really have? Most details of his alleged existence were fed to the media by the Pentagon. Mysterious couriers (who could easily have been CIA operatives) would drop off messages to al Jazeera supposedly from the mystery man. The Pentagon has now announced his death and that he had been identified by his DNA. (By the way, where exactly did the Pentagon get al Zarqawi’s DNA?)

A writer on one website asks “Do you believe that there is actually such a person as Abu Musab al-Zarqawi? Or has he been ‘created’ by the Pentagon to distract from the fact that Iraq is a massive failure? When we were being pushed into this illegal war, the administration made a big deal about the so-called ‘link’ between Saddam and Al Qaeda validating it with the statement that al-Zarqawi was fitted with an artificial leg in Baghdad and lived and worked in Al Qaeda training camps in the northern Kurdish areas. However, the newly redesigned al-Zarqawi doesn’t seem to have a bum leg. Even some FOX News guests have attempted to explain away this obvious discrepancy. A 17-page letter, purportedly intercepted last year from a deal Al Qaeda courier and allegedly written by al-Zarqawi, has still not been verified by certified document examiners. Yet the media treats it as if it was thoroughly and publicly vetted. Last April, just prior to the first Fallujah stand-off, independent reporter Dahr Jamail reported that the average Iraqi didn’t believe in the existence of al-Zarqawi.” (more…)

by Rep. Ron Paul

In recent weeks, the Bush administration has stated its willingness to use diplomacy in dealing with Iran, which is a welcome change from previous policy. Let’s hope it’s more than just a change in tone. With ongoing wars in Iraq and Afghanistan costing more than $5 billion per week, record levels of federal spending and debt, and oil hovering around $70 per barrel, American taxpayers certainly cannot afford another war.

Iran, like Iraq, is a major source of global oil. For all our posturing, the truth is that worldwide crude prices would spike rapidly if we attacked Iran. With summer coming, demand will increase and gas prices at the pump will be over $3 for most of the nation. Airlines are raising ticket prices to compensate for jet fuel prices that have nearly doubled in a year. A strike on Iran in coming months would create serious trouble for an American economy that is already struggling with high energy prices. (more…)

The article below contains excellent information about the 2004 election. Electronic voting machines have opened the door for massive fraud.

Prior to electronic voting machines, thousands of votes might be stolen in an election. Today millions of votes can be stolen. Not only did Bush NOT win Ohio, he probably got a minority of the vote in 2004 just as he did in 2000. –Charles Coughlin

By Robert F. Kennedy Jr.

Republicans prevented more than 350,000 voters in Ohio from casting ballots or having their votes counted - enough to have put John Kerry in the White House.
The complete article, with Web-only citations, follows. For more, see exclusive documents, sources, charts and commentary.

Like many Americans, I spent the evening of the 2004 election watching the returns on television and wondering how the exit polls, which predicted an overwhelming victory for John Kerry, had gotten it so wrong. By midnight, the official tallies showed a decisive lead for George Bush - and the next day, lacking enough legal evidence to contest the results, Kerry conceded. Republicans derided anyone who expressed doubts about Bush’s victory as nut cases in “tinfoil hats,” while the national media, with few exceptions, did little to question the validity of the election. The Washington Post immediately dismissed allegations of fraud as “conspiracy theories,” [1] and The New York Times declared that “there is no evidence of vote theft or errors on a large scale.” [2] (more…)

by James Buchanan

One of the most impressive developments in the battle over illegal aliens has taken place in Texas. In a stroke of sheer genius, as many as one thousand cameras will be set up along the border and ordinary Internet users (like us) can log on and report any illegal aliens crossing the border. It remains to be seen whether the INS will do their part and speedily respond to each report of illegals by Internet users. As usual, the top INS bureaucrats will drag their feet and leave large intentional gaps in the border so that drug smugglers and a flood of slave labor can scurry across. The live coverage of the illegal alien invasion will lead to massive public outrage and things will change in a hurry. The open borders crowd in DC will soon find a very large fire lit under their posteriors.

This Internet-camera idea represents two BIG victories. The first is the enlistment of the American public in a volunteer capacity to help guard the border. When George Bush referred to the Minutemen as “vigilantes” he demonstrated the out-of-touch, arrogant attitude of the liberal Democrats and moderate Republicans who couldn’t care less how many million Mexicans cross the border. The second victory is that Americans for the first time will be able to see actual illegal aliens crossing the US border, real-time on their home computer. The broadcasting of the illegal alien problem on a live Internet feed will wake up millions of Americans who have not yet had their towns overrun by the brown invasion and will further outrage Americans who are already angry over the sell out on the border. (more…)

by Charles Coughlin

Some recent opinion polls have claimed that a mere 60 percent of Americans oppose an illegal alien amnesty. The opposition to an amnesty is much HIGHER than that. Whenever our masters in Washington DC sell us out on an important issue, they try to confuse the issue and make it look like support for the “sell out” is much higher than it actually is. During the debate over NAFTA and GATT, public opinion was easily 90 percent against these treason treaties. But big business paid for bogus, biased polls that showed much greater support for NAFTA and GATT so that the public would be less outraged.

By carefully wording a poll, the pollster can intimidate many people into responding the way they want them to. Other polls are nothing but complete fabrications announced to a gullible media, which reports them unquestioningly as fact.

Americans have been brainwashed to be wimpy washcloths on controversial issues and to always support the “compromise” solution. (Why should anyone ever compromise with evil?) The more controversial a pollster makes an issue sound, the more people back away from what they really believe. It would be no surprise if a pro-amnesty pollster asked “Do you favor dragging undocumented people out of their homes in the middle of the night and legally prosecuting them?” (more…)

by Paul Craig Roberts

Is the Bush Regime a state sponsor of terrorism?

A powerful case can be made that it is.

In the past three years, the Bush Regime has murdered tens of thousands of Iraqi civilians and an unknown number of Afghan ones.

U.S. Marines, our finest and proudest military force, are under criminal investigation for breaking into Iraqi homes and murdering entire families. In an unprecedented event, Gen. Michael Hagee, the Marine Corps commandant, has found it necessary to fly to Iraq to tell our best-trained troops to stop murdering civilians.

Gen. Hagee found it necessary to tell the U.S. Marines: “We do not employ force just for the sake of employing force. We use lethal force only when justified, proportional, and most importantly, lawful.” (more…)

by Ian Mosley

The self-absorbed and self-dramatizing behavior of American celebrities is becoming more and more bizarre and arrogant by the year. Actress Angelina Jolie and her main man Brad Pitt, the Hollywood hunk with the room-temperature IQ who knocked up the half-breed starlet in an adulterous affair after they co-starred in the movie “Mr. and Mrs. Smith,” have given birth to an illegitimate daughter in NAMIBIA, of all places. In order to do so, they jetted in and more or less took over the whole country.

A Reuters article notes “The Republic of Namibia - the impoverished country of 1.8 million known for its wild remoteness - not only welcomed the movie stars, it handed over control of its international land borders and airspace to them. As the world awaited the birth of the child at a luxury villa complex on the coast, Namibian authorities said they had bowed to pressure from Jolie and Pitt and granted them the right to ban foreign journalists from entering the country - a remarkable move for the Government of any sovereign state.” (more…)

by James Buchanan

One of the few things absolutely certain in the political world is George Bush’s devotion to a guest worker-amnesty program for illegal aliens. It was a strange day recently when Bush announced that he wanted 6,000 National Guard troops on the border. In the same speech Bush (again) mentioned his (much hated) guest worker program. Anyone with any political common sense knows that Bush is desperately trying to avoid a GOP disaster during the November election. The Iraq War is an albatross around the neck of the Republican Party. The Abramoff bribery scandal has also done some damage and Bush himself has an abysmal 29 approval rating. Clearly a populist issue needs to be exploited! If the Democrats take over the House (and possibly the Senate) then an impeachment of George Bush is a very real possibility. The Democrats want revenge for the Clinton impeachment, and a lame duck is a very easy political target.

Shortly after Bush’s speech, a barrage of questions came from all political directions. One theory was that Bush deliberately picked the one branch of the military that was the most over-extended and over-worked. 75 percent of National Guard equipment is in Iraq right now. Perhaps Bush and all the “open borders” country club Republicans knew that the Guard would be tired and poorly-equipped. The National Guard is supposed to do one weekend of service per month and then a week or two of service during the summer. The people serving in the Guard have civilian jobs (or they HAD civilian jobs before Bush and Rumsfeld sent them to Iraq for multiple tours). (more…)

As You would have them do unto you

by Charles Coughlin

Imagine a young man, who has a pregnant sister who suddenly goes into labor. He hops in his car with her and a female cousin and races for the hospital. Imagine the police have put up a road block to try to catch a bank robber. The man with the pregnant sister doesn’t want to wait in line for an hour. He passes up the parked cars on the shoulder of the road. He hopes the police will look into his car and see that he has a pregnant woman inside along with another female relative and let him pass. Instead the police open fire killing the pregnant woman, the unborn baby and the man’s female cousin. Americans would never stand for this sort of outrageous police behavior.

But this is exactly the sort of burden we have imposed on the civilians of Iraq. A recent news article reports: “U.S. forces killed two Iraqi women — one of them about to give birth — when the troops shot at a car that failed to stop at an observation post in a city north of Baghdad, Iraqi officials and relatives said Wednesday. Nabiha Nisaif Jassim, 35, was being raced to the maternity hospital in Samarra by her brother when the shooting occurred Tuesday. Jassim, the mother of two children, and her 57-year-old cousin, Saliha Mohammed Hassan, were killed by the U.S. forces, according to police Capt. Laith Mohammed and witnesses. The U.S. military said coalition troops fired at a car… (which) failed to stop despite repeated visual and auditory warnings. Jassim’s brother, who was wounded by broken glass, said he did not see any warnings as he sped his sister to the hospital. Her husband was waiting for her there. ‘I was driving my car at full speed because I did not see any sign or warning from the Americans. It was not until they shot the two bullets that killed my sister and cousin that I stopped,’ he said. ‘God take revenge on the Americans and those who brought them here. They have no regard for our lives.’ He said doctors tried but failed to save the baby after his sister was brought to the hospital. The shooting deaths occurred in the wake of an investigation into allegations that U.S. Marines killed unarmed civilians in the western city of Haditha.” (more…)