White Civil Rights : The Website for Europeans and Americans Wherever They May Live

by Jeff Davis

Not only did George W. Bush and his little neocon friends deceive the American people about the reasons for invading Iraq, they are now deceiving them about the deceptions. Dubya and his cronies have taken to lashing out hysterically at anyone who questions their version of things, including anyone who leaks information to the media about their own un-Constitutional and pernicious practices. Several weeks ago, when the media got hold of the story that the neocon cabal had ordered and was still conducting warrantless wiretaps and surveillance of American citizens, the Bush administration’s response was to launch an intensive search for the source of the leak so he or she could be prosecuted.

The administration is now lying about its lies. It is now beyond question that the original reasons given by the President of the United States, for the invasion of Iraq were false in their entirety, and that the President and his cabal knew these reasons were bogus. Now Bush and the neocons are claiming that that it’s irresponsible to question the old excuse for the war. (Perhaps it’s even more irresponsible not to prosecute a gang of criminals who lied our nation into war.) Three years ago, George W. Bush and a small coterie of neocons and oil company executives made a conscious decision to tell lies to the American people in order to launch a foreign war of conquest. A recent Andrew Greeley article on this subject said “The president is not a man who likes to admit he was wrong. Therefore, one must cover up the mistakes.” But the problem is that George W. Bush was more than wrong. This was not an honest mistake. This was a deliberate deception on the part of a leader whose mental stability and basic sanity has come increasingly under question, even if that questioning is still being whispered under Washington’s breath. (more…)

by James Buchanan

White people tend to be creative and hard-working. White nations over the last 2,500 years have been the most advanced and prosperous in the world. Unfortunately wealth and prosperity invariably attract Jews. Once the Jews have been in a Gentile nation for a few generations, that nation is always beset by wars, corruption and eventually a failed economy.

Europe has suffered a series of Ice Ages and mini-Ice Ages which limited the population. The first nation in Europe to develop an advanced civilization was Greece, which is also the furthest south. Prior to civilization arising in Europe, Egypt, Babylon and Persia were the most prosperous nations in the world and these were the nations that the Jews first lived in. The Jews over thousands of years developed very keen abilities to usurp power and to take wealth away from their host nations. (more…)

by Charles Coughlin

It is a simple fact of life that two Gay men getting physical with each other is repulsive to normal straight men. The suggestion that two normal men would lapse into Gayness while out on the trail is also ridiculous. A film that promotes this theme is more Gay propaganda or fantasy than a serious movie. A recent movie review by Rip Rense notes “I’m a homophobe. That’s the verdict rendered, apparently, just because I don’t want to see ‘Brokeback Mountain.’ I suppose not wanting to see films fraught with chain-saw killings makes me a murderphobe… George Weinberg, the very psychologist who coined the term, ‘homophobe,’ says I’m one. The evidence? My aversion to seeing ‘Brokeback Mountain,’ which is a film about two cowpokes who like to poke each other… I have no problem acknowledging my fear of heights. I grip the railing at the Grand Canyon. But as long as I’m not in prison, I have no fear of homosexuals… I don’t care if Orson Welles came back from the dead to direct it. I have not seen it, will not see it, and I believe it to be an abomination… The thing that bothers me here is that this movie is what passes for important social commentary in this stupid society.”

Brokeback Mountain is doing terribly at the box office especially compared to the movie the Chronicles of Narnia. Both of these movies were released at the same time. The Chronicles of Narnia has made 536 million as of Jan. 10th, 2006 while Brokeback has made an abysmal 23 million. In a poll on the imdb website 69 percent of the people watching Narnia gave it an “A” rating while only 8 percent gave it a “D” or “F” rating. In a similar imdb poll Brokeback has 74 percent of the people who watched it giving an “A” rating while 22 percent gave it a “D” or “F” rating. Is it possible that Brokeback is “great movie” in the minds of homosexual men (and the militantly pro-Gay) who watch it, but the impartial heterosexuals who watch it consider it terrible? (more…)

Studies in Jewish Supremacism: A Series Edited and Posted by Dave Cooper

Are Jews a Distinct and Homogenous Race?

An excerpt from Dr. David Duke’s My Awakening.

One researcher summed up the overall genetic differences by saying that there was probably at least three times more genetic difference between an average Jew in France and his Gentile Frenchman neighbor than between an average French Jew and a Jew living in Russia or the Middle East.

…the same group who chronically preach to us that there are no great differences between Blacks and Whites, boldly assert that the Jewish people are genetically homogenous!

Over many generations the external resemblance to Gentiles could increase while the parts of the brain that affect behavioral tendencies and abilities could be unaffected.

–Dr. David Duke, My Awakening

Just as two species of animals occupying a particular geographic area naturally develop a group evolutionary strategy to compete for resources, so human groups can do the same - even in the civilized societies. They can develop certain behavioral traits that give them competitive advantage and greater reproductive success. In human societies, when genetically distinct groups interact, they can assimilate and lose their genetic distinction, or they can develop ethnocentric ideologies and behavior that favor the distinct characteristics of their own gene pool. An ethnocentric group could even develop a religion that rationalizes its evolutionary response to other groups.

I wondered if the Jews had become genetically distanced from the other peoples of Europe and, if so, how deep the divide was. Had their supremacist and ethnocentric tendencies become ingrained in their genetic code, or were they simply a result of the cultural attitude of their religion and the separate societies they created? Did genetic impulses create the ideology of Judaism that reinforced and intensified the Jewish genotype? Years later, in the 1990s, the same Jewish-dominated anthropology that rejected the importance of European racial consciousness and sense of identity has reasserted Jewishness and the “Jewish identity.” In “Jews, Multiculturalism, and Boasian Anthropology,” in The American Anthropologist, Jewish writer Gelya Frank celebrates American Boasian antiracist anthropology as “Jewish history.” She points out that the central Jewish role was intentionally whitewashed for fear that Gentiles would realize that Jews had a radical agenda. (more…)

The Question of Civilization: Is the Success of a Civilization Race-Dependent?

by Dave Cooper

A Commentary on Dr. David Duke’s My Awakening

This is a question upon which our survival depends. It’s the question to which Carleton Putnam’s Race and Reason led David Duke. “I asked myself,” writes David Duke, “What if the things [Carleton Putnam] writes are true? What if the distinctions, quality and composition of races are the primary factors in the vitality of civilizations (My Awakening, 37) …”It alarmed me to think of the implications of race having a cardinal role in the creation and maintenance of culture and civilization. If true, then replacement of the White race through immigration and race-mixing could conceivably destroy Western Civilization itself.” (43) (more…)

The Question of Civilization: Part II, Aryans and Indian Civilization

Edited and posted by Dave Cooper

Excerpted from Dr. David Duke’s My Awakening

Aryans, or Indo-Europeans (Caucasians) created the great Indian, or Hindu civilization. Aryans swept over the Himalayas to the Indian sub-continent and conquered the aboriginal people. The original term India was coined by the Aryan invaders from their Sanskrit word Sindu, for the river now called the Indus. Sanskrit is perhaps the oldest of the Indo-European languages, having a common origin to all the modern languages of Europe. The word Aryan has an etymological origin in the word Arya from Sanskrit, meaning noble. The word also has been associated with gold, the noble metal and denoted the golden skinned invaders (as compared to the brown skinned aboriginals) from the West.

Composed in about 1500 B.C., the Hindu religious texts of the Rig Veta tell the story of the long struggles between the Aryans and the aboriginal people of the Indian subcontinent. Sixteen Aryan states were partitioned by the sixth century A.D., and Brahmanism became the chief religion of India. The conquering race initiated a caste system to preserve their status and their racial identity. The Hindu word for caste is Varna, which directly translated into English, means color. Today the word is usually associated with occupation or trade; but that is because occupations evolved on the basis of skin color and ethnicity. The most pale skinned were called the Brahmin. These were the warrior-priest class, the top of the social ladder. The Untouchables (or Pariahs) were the racially mixed in the bottom caste.

Over the past few centuries the clear racial differences have faded, but one can still notice the lighter hues and taller statures of the higher castes. Many scholars consider Sanskrit the oldest and purest of the Indo-European languages. In modern India, the greatest insult one could pay a fellow Indian is to call him “black.”

The average Christian conservative of the Western world would be aghast at the exuberant interest displayed by the ancient Indians in sex and in the ways they publicly displayed sexual experience through art. Hindu history, though, seems to indicate that it was not preoccupation with sex that brought down the high culture as much as it was the racial impact of that obsession. In spite of strict religious and civil taboos, the ancient Aryans crossed the color line. Slavery, or a similar system, had made servant women easily obtainable and proved a dangerous temptation for some of the basest of the slave holders. Only a small percentage of each generation had sexual liaisons with the lower castes, but over dozens of generations a gradual change in the racial composition occurred. Such changes are almost imperceptible in a single generation. But they are dramatic after a millennium. (more…)

The ideas of racial “equality” and multiracialism as a social ethic are obviously crazy — as well as deadly.

by Kevin Alfred Strom

CRAZY PEOPLE say some really funny things, if you like absurd humor. A crazy person may believe that locomotives are actually made out of marshmallows. Or he may think that the only reason we can’t drink bleach without harmful effects is because we haven’t prayed to the right deity in precisely the right manner. And some lunatics are quite intelligent in their way, and may be able to produce creative and internally consistent arguments at some length to justify their positions, even if their premises are quite nutty. And all that’s good for a laugh.

For example, one Flat Earth believer insisted that the Earth was two-dimensional and shaped like a plate. And he could even explain how, on this plate-shaped Earth, people could apparently travel in a straight line and eventually end up back at their starting point. “They simply fall off the edge,” he said, “and since the Earth is two-dimensional with no thickness whatsoever, they ‘fall’ into an area comprising no space at all and reappear instantly on the opposite side of the plate to resume their straight-line journey back to their starting point.” (more…)

Pictured left: Professor J. Philippe Rushton

The following discussion about the reality of race was posted previously on The Official Website of Representative David Duke but it fits in well with our current series of articles and the facts that it presents bear repeating. Understanding the reality of race is fundamental to our continued survival. –Dave Cooper

The following was a statement released by Professor Phillippe Rushton of the University of Western Ontario in response to attempts to discredit the very concept of race and to argue that race “has no validity as a biological concept when applied to man.”

STATEMENT ON RACE AS A BIOLOGICAL CONCEPT
J. Philippe Rushton

November 4, 1996

Discussion of “race” shows little sign of diminishing, despite efforts to deconstruct the concept. Deconstructing the concept of race not only conflicts with people’s tendency to classify and build family histories according to common descent but also ignores the work of biologists studying non-human species. Ever since 1758, when the Swedish naturalist Carolus Linnaeus created the classification system still used in biology today, most zoologists have recognized at least the four human subdivisions Linnaeus delineated: Asians, American Indians, Europeans, and Africans. (Technically, some would group the first two Linnaean subdivisions together, thus yielding three major races, often termed, mongoloids, caucasoids, and negroids.) Such high-level classifications do not rule out making finer, hierarchical subdivisions within these major groups.

A race is what zoologists term a variety or subdivision of a species. Each race (or variety) is characterized by a more or less distinct combination of inherited morphological, behavioral, physiological traits. In flowers, insects, and non-human mammals, zoologists consistently and routinely study the process of racial differentiation. Formation of a new race takes place when, over several generations, individuals in one group reproduce more frequently among themselves than they do with individuals in other groups. This process is most apparent when the individuals live in diverse geographic areas and therefore evolve unique, recognizable adaptations (such as skin color) that are advantageous in their specific environments. But differentiation also occurs under less extreme circumstances. Zoologists and evolutionists refer to such differentiated populations as races. (Within the formal taxonomic nomenclature of biology, races are termed subspecies). Zoologists have identified two or more races (subspecies) in most mammalian species. (more…)

by Jeff Davis

The Washington Post reports on December 14th that a group led by psychologist Edward Dunbar are pushing to get extreme prejudice, such as “intense racism or homophobia” diagnosable as a mental illness. According to Dunbar, nasty old racists like you and me need to be locked up in the nut house (for our own good, of course) while we have our brains washed squeaky clean. Then when we are released, we can run down the street singing “We are the world” and hugging and kissing every Black and Mexican we meet.

The “small” issue of the truth is apparently irrelevant. There is a mountain of evidence indicating serious differences in intelligence and criminal behavior between the races. One website that discusses this issue can be found here. Politicians and psychiatrists are too cowardly to tell the truth about racial differences so apparently no one else can. If we admit the races are different, then there is a HUGE reason to oppose massive illegal immigration from Mexico. Both political parties are selling us out on immigration and they don’t want any grass roots movement appearing which might do something unfair like using the truth about race. (more…)

by Charles Coughlin

A recent news article reports “He’s Jewish in every way, but on New Year’s Eve, Alexei Shtukin (42) decided to dress up as Santa Clause ‘just for fun,’ and paid for his decision dearly. He was set upon by a gang of youths at the Dome nightclub in Tel Aviv, and beaten in front of his family. Youths were heard shouting, ‘dead Christian.’ Alexei and his wife had decided to head to the Dome night club in south Tel Aviv, in order to pick up their daughter, Dasha (14), who was celebrating the New Year. ‘We went inside to look for her, and then someone yelled: ‘Santa Clause.’ ‘ Alexei was convinced that the shout was one of enthusiasm, but was proved bitterly wrong. …the youths ‘kept coming after me and kicked me. I shouted to my wife and daughter: Get in the car fast. Dasha began to be hysterical. ‘Leave us alone,’ she shouted, but the youths gathered around the frightened family members, kicking Alexei, and yelling, ‘Dead Christian.’ ”

The original article may have been written in Hebrew, which may explain why it says “Santa Clause” instead of Santa Claus. Also it seems likely that the Israeli youth were yelling “Die Christian” instead of “Dead Christian” (unless they were making a negative remark about Jesus Christ). (more…)