White Civil Rights : The Website for Europeans and Americans Wherever They May Live

by Jeff Davis

Now that he has been officially crowned in his Greek Temple, the Barack Obama campaign has now resorted to outright intimidation and threats in an effort to silence criticism of the Brown Messiah.

According to the Swamp Politics site of the Chicago Tribune “Sen. Barack Obama’s campaign organized its supporters Wednesday night to confront Tribune-owned WGN-AM in Chicago for having a critic of the Illinois Democrat on its air. ‘WGN radio is giving right-wing hatchet man Stanley Kurtz a forum to air his baseless, fear-mongering terrorist smears,’ Obama’s campaign wrote in an e-mail to supporters. ‘He’s currently scheduled to spend a solid two-hour block from 9:00 to 11:00 p.m. pushing lies, distortions, and manipulations about Barack and University of Illinois professor William Ayers.’”

A couple of interesting points here. Number one is the connection between Obama and ex-Weatherman Bill Ayers. This does not in any way need to be established or proven; it is an accepted fact by everyone, including the Obamanable Snowmen. You’re just not supposed to mention it. The Second point is that the so-called “right-wing hatchet man” is a Jew, so there’s a continuing Jewish rift over being typical liberal Jews, supporting the Negro, or being militant pro-War Zionists, who side with the neocons, who hijacked the GOP.

The Tribune article goes on “Kurtz, a conservative writer, recently wrote an article for the National Review that looked at Obama’s ties to Ayers, a former 1960s radical who later emerged as a school reform advocate in Chicago. The magazine had been blocked in its initial attempts to obtain records from the University of Illinois at Chicago regarding a school reform initiative called the Chicago Annenberg Challenge, which Obama chaired and Ayers co-founded. Obama critics were quick to suggest that political clout could be involved in seeking to protect Obama from embarrassment.” (more…)

by James Buchanan

A recent article by the National Policy Institute reports that “Childless US women (are) increasing at an alarming rate… The present study has found a strong difference between different ethnic groups. Figures show that Hispanic women between 40 to 44 years have an average of 2.6 children compared to a national average of 1.9 children. Nearly one-fourth of non-Hispanic women namely white are childless…”

There’s a very solid reason for the decline in the White birth rate. Our government and big corporations continue to change laws and policies, making life WORSE for any White people, who want to raise a family. The result is a decline in the number of White children. Liberal politicians and big corporations then panic at the thought of having fewer wage slaves –er citizens, so they open up immigration from the Third World even more, making living conditions even worse for Whites in the US, which means even fewer White children as a “Destructive Feedback Loop” is created. The Third Worlders of course don’t mind the overcrowding which is natural for them, having arrived recently from Mexico City, Calcutta or Bombay.

Intelligent races tend to put off having children during difficult times. During the Great Depression and World War Two, Americans had fewer children because the future was uncertain and because job prospects were few and far between, making it difficult to support a family. (more…)

by Jeff Davis

It seems as though the Immigration Department may be having one last fling at enforcing immigration laws in this country before the new President, be it McAmnesty or Barack “Born-in-Kenya” Obama, throws open the borders and simply lets the Mexican stampede trample us and what remains of our economy.

A recent news article reports that “Federal officials say nearly 600 suspected illegal immigrants were detained in a raid on a manufacturing plant in southern Mississippi, making it the largest such sweep in the country. A spokeswoman says more than 100 of those caught up in Monday’s raid on Howard Industries were released based on humanitarian concerns, mostly because they have children. Most of the rest were transferred to a federal Immigration and Customs Enforcement facility in Jena, La. Nine 17-year-olds were transferred to the custody of the Office of Refugee Resettlement.”

“Refugees” from what? Third World poverty? Even if some of these Third World illegals face repression at home, doesn’t every human being have a certain responsibility to try to fix their home country’s problems rather than run away from them (and invariably become a refugee in a rich White nation)? Would the US even exist today if George Washington and Thomas Jefferson fled to France instead of risking their lives by fighting a revolution? (We need to change refugee laws so that political refugees can only claim asylum in a nation with the same standard of living as their home country. That should eliminate 99 percent of the so-called “political” refugees overnight.) (more…)

by Jeff Davis

Obama was not to be embarrassed at his coronation by being crowned by a bunch of drunks. That was the word to the Democratic Party’s delegations in Denver. The fact that many Democrats are alcoholic and probably make most of their key decisions inebriated is of course irrelevant.

The New York Post reports: “The New York state Democratic party devoted a page in its information packet to three separate warnings to its delegation about how hard booze hits the system in mile-high Denver. On a page titled ‘high-altitude tips’ in a packet sent to traveling New York Democrats, there were repeated reminders that the air up here is different. ‘Please monitor yourself, and remember that drinks may go to your head faster than you’re used to in New York,’ was the first cautionary paragraph. ‘We don’t want any of our members to miss delegation events or proceedings, so please stay safe.’ ” (more…)

by Jeff Davis

The political blog “America’s Right” tells us: “A prominent Philadelphia attorney and Hillary Clinton supporter filed suit this afternoon in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania against Illinois Sen. Barack Obama, the Democratic National Committee and the Federal Election Commission. The action seeks an injunction preventing the senator from continuing his candidacy and a court order enjoining the DNC from nominating him next week, all on grounds that Sen. Obama is constitutionally ineligible to run for and hold the office of President of the United States.” The case goes on to claim that Obama was born in Kenya. That some of his relatives are witnesses to this fact, and that he and his mother had taken Indonesian citizenship (and renounced their US citizenship) when they lived there.

Now, the first thing that’s interesting about this story is that I Googled my head off, and I could not find hardly any mention of this event in any mainstream media source. It’s almost as if it didn’t happen. The lawsuit was filed in Philadelphia, and I can’t even find it on the Philadelphia Inquirer. It simply isn’t being reported in mainstream US news sources.

There are hundreds of references on the right-wing blogosphere and so far millions of words have been written about the action, so I assume that it did in fact happen and that it’s not some kind of hoax–Berg himself describes the suit on his web site–but as nearly as I can find without making a day-long quest out of it, not so much as a blip about this story has appeared anywhere on the mainstream media’s radar. Dead silence.

Anyway, back to the article on America’s Right, which notes “Philip Berg, the filing attorney, is a former gubernatorial and senatorial candidate, former chair of the Democratic Party in Montgomery (PA) County, former member of the Democratic State Committee, and former Deputy Attorney General of Pennsylvania. According to Berg, he filed the suit–just days before the DNC is to hold its nominating convention in Denver–for the health of the Democratic Party. ‘I filed this action at this time,’ Berg stated, ‘to avoid the obvious problems that will occur when the Republican Party raises these issues after Obama is nominated.”

Now, here’s the second interesting thing about this story. Berg is a Jew, and clearly from his track record part of the liberal Democratic party power structure, very much an insider. So what is he doing obstructing the first black nominee since it is supposedly the “will of the party” that he be the candidate? Which hat is he wearing, his Democrat hat or his Jewish yarmulke? Or his “I love Hillary” hat?

Back to the blog: “Berg cited a number of unanswered questions regarding the Illinois senator’s background, and in today’s lawsuit maintained that Sen. Obama is not a natural born U.S. citizen or that, if he ever was, he lost his citizenship when he was adopted in Indonesia. Berg also cites what he calls dual loyalties due to his citizenship and ties with Kenya and Indonesia. Even if Sen. Obama can prove his U.S. citizenship, Berg stated, citing the senator’s use of a birth certificate from the state of Hawaii verified as a forgery by three independent document forensic experts, the issue of multi-citizenship with responsibilities owed to and allegiance to other countries remains on the table.”

I suppose it all boils down to the Great Mystery: just precisely who is behind all this Barack Obama nonsense? How exactly did this young black simply pop up a year ago out of left field, with huge amounts of untraceable cash in his kitty and a smooth campaign operating team of seasoned professionals and handlers, when -before that- no one outside Illinois even knew who he was?

The lawsuit was not mentioned at the Democrat convention. Mr. Berg’s claimed intention of sorting this out before the nomination has failed.

At this late date, one has to be concerned with fraud. Democrats in the Hawaii state bureaucracy could easily have faked birth records for Obama by now. The only way to solve the Obama citizenship issue would be to find WITNESSES, who worked at the hospital in Kenya or Hawaii where Obama was born. Obama already released one document, which has been derided as fake to a website friendly to him. Curiously, Obama released another document to a so-called “factcheck” website. How do we know the second document wasn’t just a more elaborate fake than the first document?

by Jeff Davis

One of the most fascinating angles on the increasingly creepy Barack Obama phenomenon is the question of “who be in de O-Man’s posse?” Who will be coming with him to Washington, D.C. if and when he is shoe-horned into the White House by the Diebold Corporation? I’ve noticed that during the primaries Obama kept center stage very much to himself, always with the spotlight focused solely on him. At first I figured that was just black ego, but more and more I think we need to be asking: who is the little man behind the curtain? Who is hiding in the shadows behind Barack Obama?

According to the London Telegraph, a very good paper for finding out what is really going on in the United States, since our own media won’t tell us: “If Barack Obama makes it to the White House, Britain seems set to have its first Kennedy as American Ambassador to the Court of St James’s since JFK’s father, Joe. Mandrake hears that it will be payback for Caroline Kennedy, JFK’s only surviving child and a power broker in the Democratic Party, for being such an enthusiastic cheerleader for Obama. …I am told that Miss Kennedy, 50, who has three children by her husband Edwin Schlossberg, a designer, was instrumental in persuading Ted Kennedy to back Obama, which was seen as the moment his campaign achieved critical mass. Obama is the first presidential candidate that Miss Kennedy has endorsed since she backed her uncle Ted’s unsuccessful bid for the Democratic nomination in 1980. The day after Obama became the presumptive Democratic presidential nominee in June, he appointed her to his Vice-Presidential Search Committee. She has contributed financially to Obama’s campaign, having earlier contributed to Hillary Clinton’s.”

There have been more than a few rumors of Obama having highly placed neocons in his inner circle of the same criminal nature as the pack, who came with Bush Junior. While most liberals and moderates have assumed that Obama will get us out of the Iraq War, it’s entirely possible Obama might lead us deeper into neocon-provoked wars in the Mid East, including their much-desired war on Iran. Americans need to learn that if they want peace, they need to vote for a man of strong ideals like Ron Paul, not some swarthy quota-hire president, whose wire-pullers are yet to be identified.

If and when Obama slithers into the Oval Office on the back of Diebold (or for the lack of a decent GOP opponent), who else will be packing their suitcases for Washington, D.C.? Will it be aging hippie ’60s retreads? Neocon warmongers? Or people like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, and Louis Farrakhan, not to mention the suddenly, miraculously resurrected “Reverend” Jeremiah Wright? Why are we never allowed to get a good look at who is standing in the shadows behind this creature?

Half brother George Obama lives in poverty in tiny hut in Kenya.

by James Buchanan

There’s an old saying that “Charity begins at home.” Apparently Barack Obama never heard this saying. Despite the rosy picture Obama painted in his highly self-promotional book “Dreams from My Father,” the Obama family is not a tale of people taking care of each other, but rather a tale of people ignoring the needs of their own blood relatives –at least on the Black side. Obama’s half-brother, George Obama, has recently entered the media spotlight since he lives on mere spare change per day in a six by nine foot hut with apparently no help from his rock star relative, Barack Obama.

A WorldNetDaily article reports “If Barack Obama weren’t so pathetic, he would be funny – but he isn’t; he’s prickish and offensive. And like the majority of his kind, he pompously presumes to be the exact remedy for the ills he perceives America has… And more tragically, while he speaks in oblique references pursuant to his intentions for the redistribution of wealth, should he be elected, it appears his own siblings will have to wait because Obama’s plans for largesse of other people’s wealth to his so-called ‘least of these’ doesn’t extend to his personal family when it is his ‘dollars.’ One can hardly be condemned for questioning why someone with Obama’s connections and a combined income of approximately $5 million annually allows his half-brother George to live in a mud hut in Nairobi on less than $12 – that’s right – less than $12 a year.”

Obama’s daddy, Barack Hussein Obama Senior, of course abandoned his mother in typical African fashion two years after getting her pregnant, leaving her with a chocolate baby to push around in a baby carriage through the White neighborhoods of 1960s America. Back in the ’60s, women who got knocked up by Black men were viewed with the greatest of disdain by the vast majority of Whites. Carrying around the evidence of her disgraceful behavior must have been extremely demeaning. Little wonder, the (White) Mrs. Obama was having trouble finding anyone to support her aside from her own White parents. Apparently no White man was interested in marrying this woman after she delivered a mulatto baby. Barack Senior managed to knock up another White liberal woman before going back to Africa and producing a litter of both legitimate and illegitimate offspring there.

Apparently Barack Obama is a typical liberal who believes that only government should do charity work with taxpayers’ money. He apparently feels no obligation whatsoever to reach into his own pocket and to help his own blood relatives in Africa. I wonder how Barack and his single mom mother would have faired if his WHITE grandparents didn’t support the both of them when his Black daddy ran out. Many White parents in the 1960s disowned their daughters, who got pregnant by Blacks, leaving them to scrub floors or turn to prostitution, whatever suited them best. Many White women with race-mixed babies dropped them off at an orphanage, where the chances of them being adopted were extremely slim.

If Barack wound up in an orphanage, his quota career at Harvard and in Democrat politics would not have occurred. Barack should be thanking his White grandparents for everything, but instead he seems to resent his “White” side. When Barack’s mother was dying of cancer, Barack was too busy running for the Senate to spend time with her. Barack’s mother was only comforted by her own White mother. Seems like the White side of Barack’s family is the only side that behaves with generosity and compassion toward each other.

In the 1960s, Barack’s mother eventually married an Indonesian man, who enrolled Obama in a Muslim school. Barack apparently had a much better life than his half siblings in Africa. Talk show host John Kobylt from the John and Ken show in Los Angeles remarked that Obama could at least send his brother $100, which would be a small fortune in Kenya. Most likely –after this story starts getting wide circulation– Barack will finally send some money to his closest Kenyan relatives, but that should really count for nothing. The Bible says you should judge a man by how he behaves when no one is watching, and we know how Barack behaved: he was rolling in dough while his half brother was rolling in dirt.

This episode is very reminiscent of the one in which Hillary failed to tip a single mom waitress after she got a free meal at a restaurant. Perhaps Hillary thought her benefactor should leave the tip too. The point is the cameras were NOT on Hillary as she walked away from the table not leaving even a quarter for the poor single mom serving her food. The same applies to Barack Obama, who was content to leave his half brother in a tiny mud hut. Liberals are hypocrites, who only give money to the poor, after they steal it from hard working White taxpayers. In the case of Obama, the poverty of his relatives in Kenya is so extreme, and Barack’s financial fortune so great that his hypocritical cheapness should be a crystal clear sign that we’re dealing with another badly flawed liberal, who won’t do anything for anyone else (even his own relatives) unless he can first tax the money away from you and me.

by Jeff Davis

The Jewish Senator from New York, Charles Schumer, is one of this society’s bad guys. He has two causes which he supports passionately, both of them counter to American interests and destructive of American values -namely unlimited support for Israel and gun control. It looks, though, like he might have some other, more hidden interests.

Reuters reports that “California’s attorney general is reviewing a request by former employees of IndyMac Bancorp Inc to investigate whether a New York senator triggered the bank’s collapse by releasing confidential information. At issue is a much-publicized letter that Chuck Schumer, a Democrat, sent in June to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corp (FDIC) and Office of Thrift Supervision (OTS) questioning the company’s ability to survive.” (more…)

by Jeff Davis

In a world of all-too-frequent bad news for the future of White people in North America, it’s good to be able to see the occasional positive report. MSNBC reports: “The Amish are expanding their presence in states far beyond Pennsylvania Dutch country as they search for affordable farmland to accommodate a population that has nearly doubled in the past 16 years…Also known as Anabaptists, the Amish are Christians who reject most modern conveniences and rely on horse-drawn carriages. They dress in plain, old fashioned clothing and strive for modesty and self-reliance.”

The Amish are also entirely White, one of the few remaining completely White communities left in the world. While many White people see them as a bizarre cult, genetically they are good quality Whites, and a certain percentage of them join the modern world (hopefully remembering their socially conservative origins). (more…)

by Jeff Davis

Remember the famous ending scene in the movie Fail Safe, where Slim Pickens rides the atomic bomb down into a target in Russia yelling “Yee-Haw!” and waving his cowboy hat? Well, thanks to Dubya’s incompetent bungling or deliberate insults, we may be about to get a blast from the past, quite literally.

The Daily Telegraph of London reports: “As Condoleezza Rice arrived in Georgia to finalise a peace deal and secure the withdrawal of Russian troops from the former Soviet state, Moscow issued the direct threat to another US ally. ‘Poland is making itself a target. This is 100 percent certain,’ Russia’s Interfax news agency quoted General Anatoly Nogovitsyn as saying. ‘It becomes a target for attack. Such targets are destroyed as a first priority,’” Poland recently joined NATO and is making noises about allowing the Americans to put nuclear missiles on their territory, right across from the Russian border and within ballistic “spitting distance” of St. Petersburg and Moscow. (more…)