White Civil Rights : The Website for Europeans and Americans Wherever They May Live

by Jeff Davis

While it may seem like I’m beating a dead horse, this is one “horse” that needs to stay dead. It is absolutely vital for Americans and everyone in the world to understand: GLOBAL WARMING IS A HOAX.

The British Daily Mail reports: “Scientists at the heart of the Climategate row were yesterday accused by a leading academic body of undermining science’s credibility. The Institute of Physics said worrying implications had been raised after it was revealed the University of East Anglia had manipulated data on global warming. The rebuke – the strongest yet from the scientific community – came as Professor Phil Jones, the researcher at the heart of the scandal, told MPs he had written ’some pretty awful emails’ – but denied trying to suppress data. The Climategate row, which was first revealed by the Daily Mail in November, was triggered when a hacker stole hundreds of emails sent from East Anglia’s Climatic Research Unit. They revealed scientists plotting how to avoid responding to Freedom of Information requests from climate change sceptics. Some even appeared to show the researchers discussing how to manipulate raw data from tree rings about historical temperatures. In one, Professor Jones talks about using a trick to massage figures and hide the decline.”

It should always be remembered that militant liberals and hard core Marxists were hoping to use Global Warming as an excuse to punish Capitalism. The Democrats saw the Global Warming scam as an opportunity to increase taxes on big corporations based on CO2 production. Any corporation that didn’t donate enough money to the Democrats would no doubt find themselves mercilessly hounded by liberal bureaucrats imposing insanely restrictive regulations. That’s what Global Warming was really all about.

The article continues “Giving evidence to a Science and Technology Committee inquiry, the Institute of Physics said: ‘Unless the disclosed emails are proved to be forgeries or adaptations, worrying implications arise for the integrity of scientific research and for the credibility of the scientific method. The principle that scientists should be willing to expose their results to independent testing and replication by others, which requires the open exchange of data, procedures and materials, is vital.’ ” (more…)