Israel has received more American money than any other nation on earth.

It receives this money in a lump sum at the beginning of the fiscal year.

Since the U.S. is operating at a deficit, that means the U.S. borrows the money, transfers it to an Israeli Federal Reserve Bank account, and pays interest on it long afterward, while Israel makes interest on it. See the Congressional Research Service report for details.

In addition, Israel frequently receives more money and perks: loan forgiveness programs, weapons subsidies, special trading privileges, etc. When the Pentagon refuses to turn over to Israel weaponry that the U.S. needs or technology that is classified, Israeli leaders go over the generals’ heads to pro-Israel Congressional representatives, who procure the desired items for them.

The cost of supporting Israel has been astronomical. An economist contracted by the Army War College found that the total costs, both direct and indirect, amounted to $3 trillion. On top of that is the cost of the Iraq War – at least $3 billion – which was largely promoted by Israel partisans.

Through such American subsidies over the past 60+ years, Israel’s current account balance is 29th in the world, while the U.S. has dropped to 196th. Yet, American tax money continues to flow to Israel.

Below is an article by former career foreign service officer Richard Curtiss from several years ago that thoroughly explains the unique system of aid to Israel.

The Cost of Israel to the American People

By Richard Curtiss, Editor, Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, former Foreign Service Officer

By now many Americans are aware that Israel, with a population of only 5.8 million people, is the largest recipient of U.S. foreign aid, and that Israel’s aid plus U.S. aid to Egypt’s 65 million people for keeping the peace with Israel has, for many years, consumed more than half of the U.S. bi-lateral foreign aid budget world-wide.

What few Americans understand however, is the steep price they pay in many other fields for the U.S.-Israeli relationship, which in turn is a product of the influence of Israel’s powerful U.S. lobby on American domestic politics and has nothing to do with U.S. strategic interests, U.S. national interests, or even with traditional American support for self-determination, human rights, and fair play overseas.

Besides its financial cost, unwavering U.S. support for Israel, whether it’s right or wrong, exacts a huge price in American prestige and credibility overseas. Further, Israel’s powerful U.S. lobby has been a major factor in delaying campaign finance reform, and also in the removal from American political life of some of our most distinguished public servants, members of Congress and even presidents.

Finally, the Israel-U.S. relationship has cost a significant number of American lives. The incidents in which hundreds of U.S. service personnel, diplomats, and civilians have been killed in the Middle East have been reported in the media. But the media seldom revisits these events, and scrupulously avoids analyzing why they occurred or compiling the cumulative toll of American deaths resulting from our Israel-centered Middle East policies.

Each of these four categories of the costs of Israel to the American people merits a talk of its own. What follows, therefore, is just an overview of such losses.

Financial cost

First is the financial cost of Israel to U.S. taxpayers. [updated figures] Between 1949 and 1998, the U.S. gave to Israel, with a self-declared population of 5.8 million people, more foreign aid than it gave to all of the countries of sub-Saharan Africa, all of the countries of Latin America, and all of the countries of the Caribbean combined – with a total population of 1,054,000,000 people.

In the 1997 fiscal year, for example, Israel received $3 billion from the foreign aid budget, at least $525 million from other U.S. budgets, and $2 billion in federal loan guarantees. So the 1997 total of U.S. grants and loan guarantees to Israel was $5.5 billion. That’s $15,068,493 per day, 365 days a year.

If you add its foreign aid grants and loans, plus the approximate totals of grants to Israel from other parts of the U.S. federal budget, Israel has received since 1949 a grand total of $84.8 billion, excluding the $10 billion in U.S. government loan guarantees it has drawn to date.

And if you calculate what the U.S. has had to pay in interest to borrow this money to give to Israel, the cost of Israel to U.S. taxpayers rises to $134.8 billion, not adjusted for inflation.

Put another way, the nearly $14,630 every one of 5.8 million Israelis had received from the U.S. government by October 31, 1997, cost American taxpayers $23,241 per Israeli. That’s $116,205 for every Israeli family of five.

None of these figures include the private donations by Americans to Israeli charities, which initially constituted about one quarter of Israel’s budget, and today approach $1 billion annually. In addition to the negative effect of these donations on the U.S. balance of payments, the donors also deduct them from their U.S. income taxes, creating another large drain on the U.S. treasury.

Nor do the figures above include any of the indirect financial costs of Israel to the United States, which cannot be tallied. One example is the cost to U.S. manufacturers of the Arab boycott, surely in the billions of dollars by now. Another example is the cost to U.S. consumers of the price of petroleum, which surged to such heights that it set off a world-wide recession during the Arab oil boycott imposed in reaction to U.S. support of Israel in the 1973 war.

Other examples are a portion of the costs of maintaining large U.S. Sixth Fleet naval forces in the Mediterranean, primarily to protect Israel, and military air units at the Aviano base in Italy, not to mention the staggering costs of frequent deployments to the Arabian Peninsula and Gulf area of land and air forces from the United States and naval units from the Seventh Fleet, which normally operates in the Pacific Ocean.

Many years ago the late Undersecretary of State George Ball estimated the true financial cost of Israel to the United States at $11 billion a year. Since then direct U.S. foreign aid to Israel has nearly doubled, and simply adjusting that original figure into 1998 dollars would send it considerably higher today.

Cost in international prestige and credibility

Next comes the cost of Israel to the international prestige and credibility of the United States. Americans seem constantly astounded at our foreign policy failures in the Middle East. This stems from a profound ignorance of the background of the Israeli-Palestinian dispute, which in turn results from a reluctance by the mainstream U.S. media to present these facts objectively.

Toward the end of the 19th century when political Zionism was created in Europe, Jews were a tiny fraction of the population of the Holy Land, much of which was heavily cultivated and thickly populated, and certainly not a desert waiting to be reclaimed by outsiders.

Even in 1947, after half a century of Zionist immigration and an influx of Jewish refugees from Hitler, Jews still constituted only one third of the population of the British Mandate of Palestine. Only seven percent of the land was Jewish-owned. Yet when the United Nations partitioned Palestine in that year, the Jewish state-to-be received 53 percent and the Arab state-to-be received only 47 percent of the land. Jerusalem was to remain separate under international supervision, a “corpus seperatum” in the words of the United Nations.

One of the myths that many Americans still believe is that the initial war between the Arabs and Israelis broke out on May 15, 1948 when the British withdrew and military units from Egypt, Jordan, Iraq and Syria entered Palestine, allegedly because the Arabs had rejected a partition plan that the Israelis accepted.

In fact, the fighting began almost six months earlier, immediately after the partition plan was announced. By the time the Arab armies intervened in May, some 400,000 Palestinians already had fled or been driven from their homes. To the Arab nations the military forces they sent to Palestine were on a rescue mission to halt the dispossession of Palestinians from the areas the U.N. had awarded to both the Jewish and the Palestinian Arab state. In fact history has revealed that the Jordanian forces had orders not to venture into areas the U.N. had awarded to Israel.

Although the newly created Israeli government didn’t formally reject the partition plan, in practice it never accepted the plan. To this day, half a century later, Israel still refuses to define its borders.

In fact, when the fighting of 1947 and 1948 ended, the State of Israel occupied half of Jerusalem and 78 percent of the former mandate of Palestine. About 750,000 Muslim and Christian Palestinians had been driven from towns, villages and homes to which the Israeli forces never allowed them to return.

The four wars that followed, three of them started by Israel in 1956, 1967, and 1982, and one of them started by Egypt and Syria to recover their occupied lands in 1973, have been over the portions of Lebanon, Syria, Jordan and Egypt which the Israelis occupied militarily in those wars, the other half of Jerusalem, and the 22 percent of Palestine – comprising the West Bank and Gaza – which is all that remains for the Palestinians.

It is the unwillingness of successive U.S. governments to acknowledge these historical facts, and adjust U.S. Middle East policies to right these wrongs, that has resulted in such a devastating loss of international credibility. Americans, who once were identified with the modern schools, universities and hospitals they had established throughout the Middle East starting more than 150 years ago, now are identified with U.S. misuse of its veto in the United Nations to condone Israeli violations of the human rights of the Palestinians living in the lands Israel has seized by force. The Israeli occupation violates the preface to the United Nations Charter banning the acquisition of territory by war. What the Israeli government has been doing in the occupied territories also violates the Fourth Geneva convention, which forbids the transfer of populations to or from such areas.

Governments of Middle Eastern countries which once looked to the United States as their protectors from European colonialism, now find it very difficult to justify maintaining cordial relations with the United States at all. Friendly Arab governments are jeopardized by their U.S. alliances, and the fall of one, the Hashemite Kingdom of Iraq, was directly attributable to its premature withdrawal of its armed forces from Palestine during the 1948 fighting, and its subsequent membership in a military alliance with the U.S. and Britain.

Even our European and Asian allies have joined in deploring the perpetual American tilt toward Israel. In a recent vote on a U.N. General Assembly resolution calling upon Israel to curb further encroachments on Palestinian lands by Jewish settlers, only the United States and Micronesia voted with Israel. Of the 185 U.N. member nations, all of the others, without exception, voted against Israel or abstained.

Yet Americans seem oblivious to such examples of how their Israel-centered Middle East policies are isolating the United States in the world.

Israel’s powerful and deceptive Lobby

Next is the cost of Israel to the American domestic political system. In December 1997, Fortune magazine asked professional lobbyists to select the most powerful special interest group in the United States. They chose the American Association of Retired Persons, which lobbies on behalf of all Americans over 60.

In second place, however, was the American Israel Public Affairs Committee, Israel’s official Washington, D.C. lobby, with a $15 million budget – the sources of which AIPAC refuses to disclose – and 150 employees. AIPAC, in turn, can draw upon the resources of the Conference of Presidents of Major American Jewish Organizations, a roof group set up to coordinate the efforts on behalf of Israel of some 52 national Jewish organizations.

Among those organizations are groups such as B’nai B’rith’s Anti-Defamation League (ADL), with a $45 million budget, and Hadassah, the Zionist women’s group, which spends more than AIPAC and sends thousands of Americans every year to Israel on Israeli government-supervised visits.

Both AIPAC and the ADL maintain secret “opposition research” departments which compile files on politicians, journalists, academics and organizations, and circulate this information through local Jewish community councils to pro-Israel groups and activists in order to damage the reputations of those who dare to speak out and thus have been blackballed as “enemies of Israel.” In the case of ADL, police raids on the organization’s Los Angeles and San Francisco offices established that much of the information they had compiled was erroneous, and thus slanderous, and some also was illegally obtained.

In the case of AIPAC, this is not the organization’s most controversial activity. In the 1970s members of AIPAC’s national board of directors set out to form deceptively named local political action committees (PACs) which could coordinate their efforts in supporting candidates in federal elections. To date, at least 126 pro-Israel PACs have been registered, and no fewer than 50 PACs, like AIPAC, can give a candidate who is facing a tough opponent and who has voted according to AIPAC recommendations up to half a million dollars. That’s enough money to buy all the television time needed to get elected in most parts of the country.

What is totally unique about AIPAC’s network of political action committees is that they all have deceptive names. Who could possibly know that the Delaware Valley PAC in Philadelphia, San Franciscans for Good Government in California, Cactus PAC in Arizona, Chili PAC in New Mexico, Beaver PAC in Wisconsin and even Ice PAC in New York are really pro-Israel PACs. So just as no other special interest can put so much hard money into any candidate’s election campaign as can the Israel lobby, no other special interest has gone to such elaborate lengths to hide its tracks.

Some of America’s wisest and most distinguished public servants have been kept from higher office by the blackballing of the Israel lobby. One such leader was George Ball, who served the Kennedy administration as Under Secretary of State and the Johnson administration as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations. Given his unmatched brilliance in forecasting international developments, there is no doubt that he would have become secretary of state had he not publicly expressed the skepticism about the U.S. relationship with Israel which most Americans involved in foreign affairs privately feel.

In membership meetings which journalists are not allowed to attend, AIPAC presidents have boasted that the organization was responsible for the defeats of two of history’s most distinguished chairmen of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee – Democrat J. William Fulbright of Arkansas and Republican Charles Percy of Illinois. The list of other Senators and House members for whose election defeats AIPAC takes credit is too long to recount.

There is good evidence also that had it not been for complex maneuvers by the Israel lobby, including encouragement of third party candidates and unrelenting partisanship by pro-Israeli syndicated columnists and other media figures, Democratic President Jimmy Carter probably would have been reelected in 1980, and Republican President George Bush almost certainly would have been reelected in 1992.

The cost to our political system of losing national figures who refused to allow U.S. domestic political interests to dictate U.S. foreign policy has been enormous. So long as AIPAC and other powerful lobbies continue to thwart meaningful efforts on behalf of campaign finance reform, Americans will continue unknowingly paying such costs.

The cost in American lives

Finally, there is the cost of Israel in American lives. References to the attack by Israeli aircraft and torpedo boats on the USS Liberty in which 34 Americans were killed and 171 wounded on the fourth day of the Six-Day War of June 1967 often are met by disbelief. Very few Americans seem to have heard of the attack on the ship operated by the U.S. Navy for the National Security Agency to monitor Israel and Arab military communications during the fighting.

The Israeli government claimed it was a case of mistaken identity. The members of the crew and other naval officers who were stationed in the Mediterranean and in Washington at the time state that it was a deliberate attempt to sink the ship and blame Egyptian forces for the disaster. It is the only such event in U.S. Naval history the cause of which has never been formally investigated either by Congress or by the Navy itself.

Major losses of American lives at the hands of Arab forces opposing Israel are better known. These include the loss of 141 U.S. service personnel in the bombing of the U.S. Marine barracks in Beirut in 1984. They also include the loss of several U.S. diplomats and local employees of the U.S. government in two bombings of the American Embassy in Beirut. Other such events include the bombing of the U.S. Embassy in Kuwait, the taking of U.S. hostages in Beirut of whom three were killed, the deaths of Americans in a series of Middle East related skyjackings, the deaths of 19 U.S. service personnel in the bombing of the Al Khobar Towers in Saudi Arabia, and the 1997 assassination of four U.S. accountants working for an American company in Karachi.

All of these incidents, and many more in which Americans have died, resulted directly from one-sided U.S. support for Israel in its refusal to participate in the land-for-peace settlement with the Palestinians and its other Arab neighbors envisioned in U.N. Security Council Resolution 242. The U.S. has given lip service to that resolution since November 1967. But in practice the U.S. has done nothing to force Israel to comply, even though the resolution has been accepted by the members of the League of Arab States. That U.S. hypocrisy fuels rage and frustration throughout the Middle East and South Asia which will continue to take a toll of American lives until Israel finally gives back the lands it occupied in 1967, or the U.S. stops subsidizing Israeli intransigence.

False claims of positive results from US support for Israel

Claims that there are positive aspects of the U.S.-Israeli relationship seldom stand up to scrutiny. During the Reagan administration it was labeled for the first time a “strategic relationship” conferring benefits on the U.S. as well as on Israel. The idea that Israel – smaller in both area and population than Hong Kong – can offer the United States benefits sufficient to offset the hostility that relationship arouses among 250 million Arabs living in a 4,000-mile strategic swath of territory stretching from Morocco to Oman is ludicrous. It becomes even more ludicrous when one realizes that the relationship also has alienated another 750 million Muslims who, together with the Arabs, control more than 60 percent of the world’s proven oil and gas reserves. Apologists for Israel also describe the U.S.-Israeli cooperation in weapons development. The fact is that the one or two successful joint weapons programs have been largely U.S. financed, while for their part the Israelis have repeatedly sold to rogue nations U.S. weapons turned over at no cost to Israel.

It is a sad but proven fact that the Israeli government also has obtained secret U.S. military technology which Israel has sold to other countries. For example, after the U.S. sent Patriot missile defense batteries on an emergency basis to help defend Israel during the Gulf War, the Israelis seem to have sold the Patriot missile technology to China, according to the U.S. State Department’s inspector general. As a result, the U.S. has been forced to develop a whole new generation of missile technology able to penetrate the defenses China has developed as a result of the Israeli treachery.

Perhaps the most hypocritical rationalization offered by friends of Israel is that U.S. special treatment is justified because Israel is “the Middle East’s only working democracy” and that Israel and the U.S. have many basic institutions in common. In fact, Israeli democracy does not work for non-Jews. In contrast to the United States, where by law all citizens have equal rights regardless of religion or ethnic origin, Muslim and Christian citizens of Israel do not have equal rights with regards to military service, the extensive social benefits available to veterans of Israeli military service, or even in terms of Israeli tax rates imposed on Arab citizens and Israeli government expenditures in Arab communities within Israel.

Further, Israeli citizenship is not available to the Muslim and Christian Palestinians driven from their homes in Israel in 1948, nor to their descendants. But a Jew, born anywhere in the world, can have Israeli citizenship for the asking.

Perhaps most shocking is the little-known fact that by now 90 percent of the land in Israel proper is held under restrictive covenants barring non-Jews, even those with Israeli citizenship, from owning the land or from earning a living on it. Unfortunately, the land held under such covenants is increasing, not decreasing. It would be difficult, therefore, to find two countries more profoundly different in their approaches to basic questions of citizenship and civil and human rights as are the United States and Israel.

Richard H. Curtissenlisted in the U.S. Army in World War II, and served as a military correspondent in Berlin, Germany after the war. After earning a B.A. in journalism from the University of Southern California and working on newspapers and for the United Press, he served as a career Foreign Service officer with the Department of State and the U.S. Information Agency throughout the world and in Washington D.C. During his U.S. government career he received the U.S. Information Agency’s Superior Honor Award and the Edward R. Murrow award for excellence in Public Diplomacy, U.S.I.A.’s highest professional recognition.

Curtiss is currently the Executive Editor of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.

Original article

by Jeff Davis

ABC News reports: “Samples of DNA were collected without parental consent from students at a Sacramento, Calif., middle school in connection with the murder of an 8th grade student who was found stabbed, strangled and beaten to death near the dugout of a local park. The Sacramento Sheriff’s Department, which has been spearheading the investigation into the murder of Jessica Funk-Haslam, 13, said parental consent was not required in the DNA collection and interview of minors, several of whom were taken out of class during the day last week at Albert Einstein Middle School.”

“’These are interviews, not interrogations,’ Sheriff’s Deputy Jason Ramos told ABCNews.com. They are all consensual. Once it’s done, there is a mechanism in place for school administrators to notify parents.’ Ramos said the DNA collection was done at the time of the interview so efforts didn’t have to be duplicated. Ramos cautioned that the collection did not necessarily mean authorities had a DNA profile of the suspect.”

“Over the past few weeks, police have sifted through a number of leads and alibis but have been unable to name a suspect in Jessica’s murder. The teen’s body was found at Rosemont Community Park on the morning of March 6. Jessica was reportedly arguing with her mother the night before and voluntarily left her home and boarded local transportation to a local park.”

“There is nothing under California law that prohibits DNA collection of consenting minors, said John Myers, a professor at the McGeorge School of Law in Sacramento. ‘I think the answer is, kids can consent, and if they consented and it was knowing and intelligent, [law enforcement] can do the search,’ he told the Sacramento Bee.”

First of all, just how bad has our society become that a 13 year old girl who runs away to a local park winds up dead?!! Is there a Black or Latino gang presence in the area? Did she meet a creepy pedophile on the Internet, who arranged to meet her there? Assuming she was going to school with normal White children, it seems unthinkable that one of them would be the murderer. Also, the state of California has been releasing large numbers of prisoners early to “save money”. I wonder how many of them are sex offenders?

The people being asked to volunteer their DNA are 13-year-old kids. They can’t legally drink, they can’t vote, and they can’t drive a car or buy a gun, but they can consent to sign away their Constitutional rights? Remember that these kids are going to class together, sitting next to each other and passing each other in the hallways. Let’s say the only DNA that the police find is from a hair from another student that got on Jessica’s sweater. It’s entirely possible that the prosecutor may use that as the basis of a murder prosecution. Of course by that time it’s too late to say you don’t want to volunteer your DNA, but a 13 year old may not realize how off-target a police prosecution can go.

What you have to bear in mind is that California is in the process of becoming a Third World country in every sense including danger and a loss of Rights. White people have been fleeing the state for a generation, due to the crushing taxes on private enterprise, the pervasive corruption of the state government and a population which is over half non-White.

by Jeff Davis

The so-called Transportation Safety Agency, in addition to preventing not one single hijacking since its inception, appears to be turning into even more of a joke than the usual federal bureaucracy.

The Fort Worth Star-Telegram reports: “A Transportation Security Administration baggage inspector at Dallas/Fort Worth Airport has been indicted in the theft of Apple iPads from luggage over eight months. Clayton Keith Dovel, 36, of Bedford was arrested Feb. 1 and has been suspended indefinitely, officials said. The investigation led to the recovery of eight stolen iPads, including one that was among Dovel’s possessions at Terminal E when he was arrested, airport police said. His attorney, Greg Westfall, declined to comment.”

One assumes that some kind of background check is done on these people before they are employed? Right? Or is it a pure political patronage job under the Democrats?

The Star-Telegram goes on: “The indictments that the Tarrant County grand jury issued this week charge Dovel with theft by a public servant of items valued at up to $20,000. If convicted, he could face two to 10 years in prison.”

“According to airport police, a traveler reported Jan. 24 that his iPad 2 had been stolen and that he had traced it electronically to a home in Bedford owned by Dovel.”

Apparently this individual didn’t realize that could be done, which says something about his level of intelligence. Criminal activity aside, do we really want somebody this dumb in charge of airport security?

“While arresting Dovel in that case, airport police discovered another iPad in Dovel’s leather satchel. Dovel told authorities that the iPad was his but that he couldn’t remember where he bought it, according to police reports.”

“Using that iPad’s serial number, police traced it to a Grand Prairie man who had reported that it was stolen as he traveled through Terminal E in May. In the indictment, Dovel is also accused of stealing iPads in November and early January. The TSA issued a statement calling the arrest part of a zero-tolerance policy for allegations of misconduct or theft at the airport.”

Why do they call it zero tolerance? Does that mean some airports tolerate TSA agents stealing some of your stuff?

Remember when the big complaint about airport security used to be that they were unqualified and unhygienic rent-a-cops from some contract security company? Well, doesn’t look like much has changed, except that now in addition to thieves like this character Dovel the TSA attracts perverts who like to grope travelers’ genitals.

If enough Americans just refuse to fly, the Feds can be forced to get rid of the TSA. Just tell your Congressman that you won’t fly again until the TSA is gone.

by Jeff Davis

Looks like the left-wing lunatic anarchists are taking a page out of the Blacks’ playbook and forming flash mobs now. An article from Fox News in New York reports: “Police say a mob of 25 anarchists fought with officers and tried to use eight-foot-long metal pipes to smash windows of a Starbucks in the East Village on Saturday.”

“The incident happened around 8:45 p.m. at the Starbucks on the corner of Astor Place and Lafayette Street. Customers were sent diving under tables during the attack. The mob was unable to smash the thick protective plexiglass windows and there ended up being no damage to the store.”

“Police arrested Eric Marchese, 24, Alexander Penley, 41 and Nicholas Thommen, 30. All three men face multiple charges. Two officers sustained minor injuries in the melee. Police said a crowd, some wearing masks, stormed out of an Anarchist Book Fair at Church across the street from Washington Square Park. Many participants at the sixth annual event tipped garbage cans and spray-painted anarchist symbols on businesses in the area. Police made another arrest at an after-party at the 6th Street community center. Officers were also attacked at that location as they tried to remove the suspect from the building.”

Interesting that the Starbucks people figured their New York stores need smash-proof glass.

Sometimes it’s good to bear in mind that it isn’t only racial minorities who are the problem in this country. There is a small but violent Communist and Anarchist element still, a holdover from the creepy Sixties, who are still around. The “Occupy Wall Street” movement seemed to be a recent high point for them although a wide variety of Americans were swept up with resentment against Wall street corporations that get bail outs with taxpayer money. I wonder if having a black president to re-elect may be stirring them up now.

For some reason the leftists really hate chain food stores like Starbucks and McDonald’s and Burger King, probably because these companies are outstanding examples of successful capitalism who serve a tasty product and actually employ a lot of people. And we can’t have capitalism that works, now, can we?

It’s not quite certain exactly what these anarchists want to replace the present system with. They don’t seem to know themselves, but they are handy to whip up rent-a-mobs for the left, which is a phenomenon we will be seeing more and more of as Obama ‘s re-election campaign progresses.

by Ian Mosley

Ever wonder what our lords and masters have in store for us next? What else can they do to us? Well, they can start stealing our children. It’s already happening in Great Britain, and as always, the United States won’t be far behind.

A recent news article reports “Yesterday the Daily Mail reported that applications to take children into care in England have soared to an all-time record, for the first time topping 10,000 in just 12 months. Since 2008 alone, the figure has much more than doubled, to some 225 cases a week — bringing the total number of children in care in the UK as a whole to at least 90,000.”

“The official reason given for this explosion in the number of children being removed from their families by social workers in only four years is that 2008 was the year when the nation was shocked by the events leading to the death of Baby P — later named as Peter Connelly. He was just 17 months old when he died in North London at the hands of his mother Tracey and her violent partner, suffering more than 50 injuries.”

This is how liberalism works: They will take one genuinely horrific case of something and use it as an excuse to further advance the all-controlling liberal police state.

The article notes “But one hugely important ingredient is missing from the way this version of events is being put across by the authorities responsible for ‘child protection’ Evidence is accumulating on all sides to show that far too many children are now being removed from their parents wholly unnecessarily, often for laughably inadequate, even absurd, reasons. No one could object if the rise in the number of families being torn apart was simply due to the increased determination of our social workers to intervene in situations likely to lead to another Baby P tragedy. But the fact is, happy children are today being snatched from loving parents for reasons they cannot begin to fathom, leaving all concerned in a state of utter misery. And this can constitute a tragedy in its own way scarcely less heart-rending than those where a child has been genuinely abused.”

There have been attempts by liberals in the US to declare any house with guns in it, an unsafe environment for children even if the parents keep their guns locked up so that the kids can’t accidentally get a hold of them. Even more sinister are attempts by liberals to declare any parents who hold racist beliefs to be unfit parents. The term “racist” of course is extremely vague, but many liberals would consider the mere belief that the races are not equal would make you a “racist”. Many Americans simply consider it to be the truth that the “races are not equal” and that people who don’t believe that are delusional. Why is it that delusional parents are not considered “unfit”?

White people need to start supporting openly pro-White political parties. At the very least, White people need to shut off all immigration from impoverished Third World countries into their homelands for obvious reasons. We need to gain some basic control over our governments or else we could soon find ourselves living in a nightmare world where are children are taken away from us for thinking politically incorrect thoughts.

The huge appropriation was announced by Jewish extremist Congressman Steve Rothman (NJ-9), a member of the House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee, who released the following statement:

“Today, I am proud to announce that $947 million has been appropriated toward Iron Dome, David’s Sling, and Arrow for the coming year.”

Meanwhile, Americans continue to struggle under one of the worst economic depressions in recent times. According to reports, a record 2.87 million properties got notices of default, auction or repossession in 2010.

The number climbed even after a plunge in filings in the last part of the year — including a 26 percent drop in December — as lenders came under scrutiny for their practices.

Foreclosures have weighed down U.S. housing prices as the nation’s unemployment rate is stuck at more than 9 percent.

Banks seized more than 1 million homes in 2010, according to RealtyTrac. That was up 14 percent from a year earlier and the most since the company began reports in 2005.

Yet in spite of all of this, the Jewish extremists and their supporters in Washington D.C. deliberately take tax money out of the pockets of soon-to-be homeless Americans, and donate it to Israel.

“These rocket and missile defense systems allow Israel the ability to protect its civilians while giving its leaders the strategic space and time to take the appropriate action to root out terrorists and carefully plan their next steps,” Mr Rothman said in his statement.

What that actually means is that U.S. tax money has gone to Israel to provide war machines with which to bombard and kill its neighbors (and even Europe: see the “Samson Option” whereby Jewish extremists even threatened to attack cities in Europe if Israel was threatened).

Congressman Rothman, another “dual loyalty” representative, said in his statement that “President Obama, Chairman Bill Young, and all of the members of the House Appropriations Defense Subcommittee understand how important it is to be at the cutting edge of anti-missile technology, both to safeguard our own citizens and troops as well as the citizens and troops of the Jewish State of Israel.”

Readers will note that there is no similar urgency in protecting American borders from wholesale invasion and that no funding at all would be given to any other state which might be reserved for one particular ethnic group.

Yet the blatant double standards do not worry Mr Rothman or his fellow travellers, because they know that the Zionist extremist controlled mass media will always hide this obvious contradiction and the racial basis of the Jewish state from the public.

“Given the concern and attention that we are focusing now on every dollar we are expending on behalf of the US taxpayer for all purposes, including the defense of the America and its allies, this appropriation shows how vitally important these systems are for our nation’s national security,” Mr Rothman ended his statement—inadvertently, or perhaps deliberately, mixing up America’s security with that of Israel’s.

The blatancy of the Zionist extremist death grip on American policy is obvious to all.

by Ian Mosley

Two young British men died a year ago in Florida, in a hate crime that wasn’t. Obama of course ignored it. They were only White boys.

The U. K. Daily Telegraph reports: “The parents of two British students murdered in Florida have criticised President Barack Obama for his lack of compassion over their sons’ deaths. His failure to respond to three letters sent to the White House was because there was no political value and not worthy of a few minutes of his time. They spoke out as [the Black] teenager Shawn Tyson began a life sentence after being found guilty of the murder of James Cooper and James Kouzaris last April. The 17 year old, who shot the men as they begged for their lives, will die in prison.”

“His conviction of first degree murder carries a mandatory life sentence without the chance of parole.”

“Life in prison” almost never actually means life these days, but assuming it’s true, we are going to be taking care of this Black criminal for how long? Say sixty years? Does anybody not see anything wrong with this? I thought Florida was a death penalty state.

The article notes “The powerfully built teen looked bored as emotional DVD presentations about the dead men prepared by their grieving parents were shown in court. Tyson, who has the word ‘Savage’ tattooed across his chest didn’t show a flicker of emotion, slumping in his seat as he was forced to watch a montage of photos showing the victims from early childhood to young men.”

“Two close friends of the dead men who had attended the eight day trial in Sarasota, Florida. had also delivered highly emotional impact statements to the court prior to the sentencing. Paul Davies and Joe Hallett spoke of the ‘living hell’ they and others who knew the men had suffered since the murders. During the eight day trial they had been shown graphic crime scene and autopsy photos shown in court. Later speaking after Tyson was jailed Davies and Hallett lashed out at Mr Obama saying the deaths of their friends was ‘not worthy of ten minutes of his time.’”

“Davies said: ‘We would like to publicly express our dissatisfaction at the lack of any public or private message of support or condolence from any American governing body or indeed, President Obama himself. Mr Kouzaris has written to President Obama on three separate occasions and is yet to even receive the courtesy of a reply. It would perhaps appear that Mr Obama sees no political value in facilitating such a request or that the lives of two British tourists are not worthy of ten minutes of his time.’”

“The rebuke follows Mr Obama’s personal intervention into the shooting in Florida of a young black teenager by a white-Hispanic neighbourhood watch captain.”

Of course Obama ignored the grief of these British parents. They are not only White, they don’t even have a vote to sell to the Democrats for some kind of government check. Why would Obama waste his time on them?

I could imagine the president of France offering his condolences to the families if the two young men were killed there. This is the sort of thing that shouldn’t happen in a civilized nation.

But then, there’s the rub. America isn’t a civilized nation with its large populations of Third World criminals allowed to run loose and Obama isn’t a member of a civilized race. He’s of the same race as the murderer and rather than offer some solace to the grieving families and friends, Obama is much more comfortable sweeping this incident under the carpet.

It’s just too bad Shawn Tyson couldn’t have run into George Zimmerman that night instead of a couple of unarmed British kids.

Golden Dawn has, however, unlike the Zionists, not demanded the suppression of anyone else’s rights, nor do they wish to steal anyone else’s land. All they have said is that true Greek interests are not those of Zionism and Jewish globalism.

The Zionist hypocrisy is blatant for all to see: Israel strictly controls immigration, and even is building concentration camps to hold illegal immigrants prior to their deportation.

The Zionists have ensured that Israel remains independent and not linked to any globalist system, despite Jewish Supremacists being largely behind the creation of the world’s financial system (see Goldman Sachs as an example) which holds most of the world in thrall.

The Zionist media, ranging from the New York Times to the Jerusalem Post, have run stories condemning Golden Dawn as a “neo-Nazi” party and worse, but in reality all that party’s policy is to control immigration into Greece, deport all illegal immigrants and ensure Greece’s independence from EU-globalist slavery and financial control.

Why is it that Israel—which is founded on land stolen from other people 60 years ago—can demand the right to be Jewish, free from outside control, and be praised by the media, yet when Golden Dawn demands that same right—in their own land, which was not stolen from anybody—the world’s media condemns them?

The answer lies in the obvious double standards at work in the Jewish Supremacist mind and which is reflected in their control of the media. Only Jews are allowed to have a homogenous state, and all the other people of the world must be mixed up, weakened and destroyed.

Golden Dawn, which polled around seven percent of the vote and is set to take up around 20 seats in the Greek parliament, has achieved a victory for every people who want to preserve their independence and freedom!

by James Buchanan

A CBS News article reports “Sen. Richard Lugar – the longest-serving senator in Indiana history – has lost his Republican Senate primary on Tuesday to state Treasurer Richard Mourdock. With 99 percent of the vote in, Lugar trailed Mourdock 61 percent to 39 percent.” Another article reports “U.S. Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine) will not run to keep her seat this November, according to local station WGME.” What did these two Senators have in common? They are two more Republicans who betrayed their constituencies and voted for the 2007 Amnesty Bill and who have been forced out of office as a result.

Prior to 2010 and the rise of the Tea Party, it was extremely rare for a multi-term incumbent Senator to be defeated in a primary election. It’s also highly unusual for a Senator to retire early. Many Senators have stayed in office until they died of old age. Well, since 2010, three long-term incumbents have been unceremoniously thrown on the trash heap of history, defeated in their own primaries thanks to the Tea Party and American voters finally holding politicians accountable for their actions.

In 2007, twelve Republicans voted for the McCain-Kennedy Amnesty Bill to give US citizenship to 20 million illegal aliens. This act of attempted treason did a great deal to wake up millions of Americans, helping to create the Tea Party movement. Most of these Senators were multi-term incumbents, who no doubt believed that they had the voters in their state so under their spell that they literally could do anything and still be reelected.

At first, it looked like these Republicans had gotten away with it. In the 2008 elections, Senators Kyl and Graham were reelected. Ironically, those two rats survived because of the closeness of the 2008 election to the 2007 Amnesty vote. The liberal media obviously didn’t expose them for selling out the American public, and the Tea Party was still in its infancy. There was not enough time for viable alternative candidates to rise up and challenge them in their primaries.

The 2010 election however saw a backlash that can only be compared to a tsunami. Senator Bob Bennett thought that he could act as though nothing had happened and breeze through his reelection. The voters however were awake and angry. Bennett, a three-term incumbent, found himself placing THIRD in his own primary!! Senator Arlen Specter meanwhile had packed up his carpet bag and fled the Republican Party, but the Democrats were onto him and Specter was defeated in the Democrat primary.

Meanwhile, the king of the Amnesty Traitors, Senator John McCain got the fight of his life in his 2010 primary. McCain was forced to spend $21 million dollars to fight off a challenge by a Tea Party candidate. McCain pretended to be a big friend of the Minutemen and even a friend of the Tea Party. McCain’s opponent had two million dollars, which came from patriotic Americans all over the US, who were eager to kick McCain out of the Senate. McCain’s survival was due entirely to his deep pockets and his chameleon-like ability to change his colors and fool the elderly voters of Arizona, who apparently don’t have Internet access and who were trusting the mainstream media for all their information.

As of 2012, three Amnesty Traitors have been defeated in primaries. Six Amnesty Traitors have been compelled to retire early in the face of angry voters back home, and only McCain, Kyl and Graham have survived. Of those three, Kyl has announced that he will retire in January 2015. It seems likely that Lindsay Graham will stand little chance of reelection by 2015 with the wrath of the Tea Party growing against him, not to mention accusations of closet homosexual behavior, which may have allowed him to be blackmailed into voting for the 2007 Amnesty Bill.

Let this be a warning to all Republicans who may be thinking of voting for an Amnesty in the future. There’s at least an 83 percent chance you will be voted out in your own primary or forced to retire early. The voters are no longer asleep on the illegal alien issue and White Republicans want you to OPPOSE the Democrats, not collaborate with them. The Tea Party is just the beginning of an awakening that will radically change politics in America and hopefully stop politicians from betraying the best interests of their voters and America.

by Ian Mosley

Anyone familiar with the history of Hollywood, will likely know that Jews are possibly the most depraved people in the world. Well, it’s not just Jews in entertainment who are depraved, apparently many orthodox Jews have the same sickness.

A CBS news article reports from New York: “The issue of child sexual abuse cuts across all ethnic and religious lines. But some say in the Hasidic and Orthodox Jewish communities of Brooklyn, the problem is compounded by religious taboos that make reporting abusers to police very rare. They say it is a secret and that children continue to suffer.”

“Mordechai Jungreis said he was victimized twice — once when his son was sexually abused by a member of the community and again when he was shunned trying to get him help. ‘I told my wife right away this child is getting molested,’ Jungreis told CBS 2′s Chris Wragge. ‘The perpetrator always got support from the community.’”

In the insular, tight-knit world of Hasidic and Orthodox Jews, problems are taken care of internally. In all matters, including sex abuse, a rabbi is consulted. Jungreis said he called many rabbis, but none helped, even though he said they knew about the alleged abuser. ‘They knew how dangerous this guy is,’ he said. ‘They never did anything to get him off the street.’”

“What made matters so difficult is that Jewish law forbids informing on another Jew. Two rabbis told Jungreis he could get around that by bringing the boy to a therapist, who would legally have to report the abuse. But when that happened, Jungreis was blamed. ‘You get revenge, hell, torture, ostracized — you name it. What a family and victim is going through if you are reporting a Jew,’ Jungreis said.”

This is one of many things that Gentiles should consider in regards to Jews. Do we want a sub-population in our nation that will cover up crimes by their fellow tribesmen? Does anyone believe that the Jewish pedophile in this story would refrain from molesting a Gentile child? The Jewish book of law, the Talmud allows Jews to commit crimes against Gentiles because Jewish law does not consider Gentiles to be their equals or even to be human beings.

The article notes “Ben Hirsch, who runs Survivors For Justice, an advocacy group for sex abuse victims in the Orthodox community, said that scenario keeps many abusers protected. ‘This is a mindset among very many parents of victims they know — that if they step forward to protect one of their children that the entire family is going to suffer serious consequences,’ Hirsch told Wragge. Hirsch said rabbis shouldn’t investigate sex crimes, but rather, the police should. However, Agudath Israel, an Orthodox policy organization, said getting the rabbi’s OK makes it easier to report cases to authorities. Hirsch said he doesn’t buy it. ‘I know of many instances of coverup. I know of many instances where rabbis are stopping people from coming forward,’ he said.”

“There have been 85 arrests in the community in recent years.”

Wait a minute! There were 85 arrests for pedophilia in a “community” of maybe a couple of hundred thousand, in “recent years”.

No matter how many years constitute “recent,” that is still an abnormal number of pedophiles, and bear in mind what the article above says, implying that most of these cases are never reported, even more so among Orthodox Jews than among anyone else.

On a percentage basis, the child-molesting problem among rabbis is likely much worse than the pedophile priest scandal ever was, but don’t hold your breath for headline news articles grilling the Jews because the Jews control the news media. They’ll report on any crimes by their enemies, like the Catholic Church, as long as possible, but an even worse scandal in their own house will get barely a whisper if any mention at all in the news.